Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37639311›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Intentions of Patients With Cancer and Their Relatives to Use a Live Chat on Familial Cancer Risk: Results From a Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey.

Paula Memenga, Eva Baumann, Hanna Luetke Lanfer, Doreen Reifegerste, Julia Geulen, Winja Weber, Andrea Hahne, Anne Müller, Susanne Weg-Remers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cancer prognosis information-seeking among survivors and caregivers: findings from the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paula MemengaHanover Center for Health Communication, Department of Journalism and Communication Research, Hanover University of Music, Drama and Media, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5067-0430
Eva BaumannHanover Center for Health Communication, Department of Journalism and Communication Research, Hanover University of Music, Drama and Media, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2357-2138
Hanna Luetke LanferBielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3118-248X
Doreen ReifegersteBielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8961-7220
Julia GeulenKrebsinformationsdienst, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-7696-2885
Winja WeberKrebsinformationsdienst, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4966-197X
Andrea HahneBRCA-Netzwerk, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-9715-4957
Anne MüllerBRCA-Netzwerk, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-9922-9098
Susanne Weg-RemersKrebsinformationsdienst, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0476-6102
German Cancer Research Center · DEBielefeld University · DEHanover University of Music Drama and Media · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn important prerequisite for actively engaging in cancer prevention and early detection measures, which is particularly recommended in cases of familial cancer risk, is the acquisition of information. Although a lot of cancer information is available, not all social groups are equally well reached because information needs and communicative accessibility differ. Previous research has shown that a live chat service provided by health professionals could be an appropriate, low-threshold format to meet individual information needs on sensitive health topics such as familial cancer risk. An established German Cancer Information Service is currently developing such a live chat service. As it is only worthwhile if accepted by the target groups, formative evaluation is essential in the course of the chat service's development and implementation.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the acceptance of a live chat on familial cancer risk by patients with cancer and their relatives (research question [RQ] 1) and examine the explanatory power of factors associated with their intentions to use such a service (RQ2). Guided by the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2), we examined the explanatory power of the following UTAUT2 factors: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and habit, supplemented by perceived information insufficiency, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and cancer diagnosis as additional factors related to information seeking about familial cancer.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey via a German web-based access panel in March 2022 that was stratified by age, gender, and education (N=1084). The participants are or have been diagnosed with cancer themselves (n=144) or have relatives who are or have been affected (n=990). All constructs were measured with established scales. To answer RQ1, descriptive data (mean values and distribution) were used. For RQ2, a blockwise multiple linear regression analysis was conducted.

resultsOverall, 32.7% of participants were (rather) willing, 28.9% were undecided, and 38.4% were (rather) not willing to use a live chat on familial cancer risk in the future. A multiple linear regression analysis explained 47% of the variance. It revealed that performance expectancy, social influence, habit, perceived susceptibility, and perceived severity were positively associated with the intention to use a live chat on familial cancer risk. Effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, information insufficiency, and cancer diagnosis were not related to usage intentions.

conclusionsA live chat seems promising for providing information on familial cancer risk. When promoting the service, the personal benefits should be addressed in particular. UTAUT2 is an effective theoretical framework for explaining live chat usage intentions and does not need to be extended in the context of familial cancer risk.

Indexed as

IntentionNeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInternetPatientscancer information seekingcancer riskcross-sectional surveydiagnosisExtended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technologyfamilial cancer riskgenetic testinglive chatpatients and relatives with cancerpatients with cancerseveritytechnology acceptance

Identifiers

PMID37639311
PMCPMC10495847
OpenAlexW4386209659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.