Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37639296›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2023

Smartphone-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions in Blended Care of Cancer Survivors: Nested Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gunther Meinlschmidt, Astrid Grossert, Cornelia Meffert, Noa Roemmel, Viviane Hess, Christoph Rochlitz, Miklos Pless, Sabina Hunziker, Brigitta Wössmer, Ulfried Geuter and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03707548 (A Clinical Trial of Group-based Body Psychotherapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 66% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03707548 nacompletednot on this map

A Clinical Trial of Group-based Body Psychotherapy (BPT) to Improve Bodily Disturbances in Post-treatment Cancer Patients in Combination With Randomized Controlled Smartphone-triggered Bodily Interventions

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2018 to 2019Enrolled88ConditionsCancer PatientsArmsBPT, Smartphone-triggered bodily interventions, Smartphone triggered control intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gunther MeinlschmidtDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3488-193X
Astrid GrossertDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3217-6556
Cornelia MeffertDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0092-3876
Noa RoemmelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7118-7720
Viviane HessFaculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4514-090X
Christoph RochlitzFaculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7808-2497
Miklos PlessDepartment of Medical Oncology, Winterthur Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5121-4402
Sabina HunzikerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3648-3609
Brigitta WössmerOutpatient Practice for Psychotherapy, Olten, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5490-0800
Ulfried GeuterInstitute for Sports and Motology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0878-7388
Rainer SchaefertDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-7289
University of Basel · CHKantonsschule Olten · CHKantonsspital Winterthur · CHPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer is related to not only physical but also mental suffering. Notably, body image disturbances are highly relevant to cancer-related changes often persisting beyond recovery from cancer. Scalable and low-barrier interventions that can be blended with face-to-face psychotherapy for cancer survivors are highly warranted.

objectiveThe aim of the study is to investigate whether smartphone-based bodily interventions are more effective to improve the mood of patients with cancer than smartphone-based fairy tale interventions (control intervention).

methodsWe recruited patients with cancer in 2 Swiss hospitals and conducted daily, fully automated smartphone-based interventions 6 times a week for 5 consecutive weeks, blended with weekly face-to-face group body psychotherapy. We applied 2 types of smartphone-based interventions using a within-subject design, randomly assigning patients daily to either bodily interventions or fairy tales. Each intervention type was presented 3 times a week. For this secondary analysis, 3-level mixed models were estimated with mood assessed by the 3 Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire subscales for good-bad mood, wakefulness, and calmness as key indicators. In addition, the effects on experience of presence, vitality, and burden assessed with visual analog scales were investigated.

resultsBased on the data from s=732 interventions performed by 36 participants, good-bad mood improved (β=.27; 95% CI 0.062-0.483), and participants became calmer (β=.98; 95% CI 0.740-1.211) following smartphone-based interventions. Wakefulness did not significantly change from pre- to postsmartphone-based intervention (β=.17; 95% CI -0.081 to 0.412). This was true for both intervention types. There was no interaction effect of intervention type with change in good-bad mood (β=-.01; 95% CI -0.439 to 0.417), calmness (β=.22; 95% CI -0.228 to 0.728), or wakefulness (β=.14; 95% CI -0.354 to 0.644). Experience of presence (β=.34; 95% CI 0.271-0.417) and vitality (β=.35; 95% CI 0.268-0.426) increased from pre- to postsmartphone-based intervention, while experience of burden decreased (β=-0.40; 95% CI -0.481 to 0.311). Again, these effects were present for both intervention types. There were no significant interaction effects of intervention type with pre- to postintervention changes in experience of presence (β=.14; 95% CI -0.104 to 0.384), experience of vitality (β=.06; 95% CI -0.152 to 0.265), and experience of burden (β=-.16; 95% CI -0.358 to 0.017).

conclusionsOur results suggest that both smartphone-based audio-guided bodily interventions and fairy tales have the potential to improve the mood of cancer survivors.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03707548; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03707548. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s40359-019-0357-1.

Indexed as

body psychotherapydigital therapeuticsecological momentary assessment (EMA)ecological momentary intervention (EMI)internet- and mobile-based interventionmicrointerventionmobile phoneneoplasmpostcancer treatmentsmartphone-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID37639296
PMCPMC10495843
OpenAlexW4367348981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.