ArticleJAMA network open2023
Prediction Model for Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer Using Routinely Measured Blood Biomarkers.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- SIGLEC12 Predicts Prognosis and Chemotherapeutic Vulnerability in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Risk Prediction of Edentulism in Chinese Adults: Insights From the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).International dental journal · 2026Article
- Multilayer network approaches to omics data integration in digital twins for cancer research.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
- Article
- CA19-9 as a Dynamic Biomarker for Continuous Monitoring of Therapeutic Efficacy in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Cancers · 2025Review
- Machine learning for identifying liver and pancreas cancers through comprehensive serum glycopeptide spectra analysis: a case-control study.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- Study of serum tumor markers in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic methods for pancreatic cancer and their clinical applications (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: Serum Biomarkers and the Potential for Aptamer-Based Biosensors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Examining the Use of Serum Biomarkers to Guide Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Longitudinal and time-to-event modeling for the survival of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2025Article
- Changes of CA19-9 levels and related influencing factors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after antidiabetic therapy.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- TFF2, a novel serum diagnostic biomarker for early pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Value of Serum D-dimer, CA19-9, and CT Imaging Features in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Benign Pancreatic Lesions.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
- Development of a Nomogram Integrating Modified Inflammation-Based Indexes for Predicting Overall Survival in Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Accurate risk prediction models using routinely measured biomarkers-eg, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and bilirubin serum levels-for pancreatic cancer could facilitate early detection of pancreatic cancer and prevent potentially unnecessary diagnostic tests for patients at low risk. An externally validated model using CA19-9 and bilirubin serum levels in a larger cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer or benign periampullary diseases is needed. Objective: To assess the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of a prediction model using readily available blood biomarkers (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 [CA19-9] and bilirubin) to distinguish early-stage pancreatic cancer from benign periampullary diseases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study used data from 4 academic hospitals in Italy, the Netherlands, and the UK on adult patients with pancreatic cancer or benign periampullary disease treated from 2014 to 2022. Analyses were conducted from September 2022 to February 2023. Exposures: Serum levels of CA19-9 and bilirubin from samples collected at diagnosis and before start of any medical intervention. Main Outcomes and Measures: Discrimination (measured by the area under the curve [AUC]), calibration, and clinical utility of the prediction model and the biomarkers, separately. Results: The study sample comprised 249 patients in the development cohort (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 67 [11] years; 112 [45%] female individuals), and 296 patients in the validation cohort (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 68 [12] years; 157 [53%] female individuals). At external validation, the prediction model showed an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84-0.93) for early-stage pancreatic cancer vs benign periampullary diseases, and outperformed CA19-9 (difference in AUC [ΔAUC], 0.10; 95% CI, 0.06-0.14; P < .001) and bilirubin (∆AUC, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.12; P = .004). In the subset of patients without elevated tumor marker levels (CA19-9 <37 U/mL), the model showed an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92). At a risk threshold of 30%, decision curve analysis indicated that performing biopsies based on the prediction model was equivalent to reducing the biopsy procedure rate by 6% (95% CI, 1%-11%), without missing early-stage pancreatic cancer in patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this diagnostic study of patients with pancreatic cancer or benign periampullary diseases, an easily applicable risk score showed high accuracy for distinguishing early-stage pancreatic cancer from benign periampullary diseases. This model could be used to assess the added diagnostic and clinical value of novel biomarkers and prevent potentially unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures for patients at low risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.