Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37639271›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Prediction Model for Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer Using Routinely Measured Blood Biomarkers.

Lenka N C Boyd, Mahsoem Ali, Annalisa Comandatore, Ingrid Garajova, Laura Kam, Jisce R Puik, Stephanie M Fraga Rodrigues, Laura L Meijer, Tessa Y S Le Large, Marc G Besselink and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Study of serum tumor markers in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lenka N C BoydDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mahsoem AliDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Annalisa ComandatoreLaboratory of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ingrid GarajovaMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Laura KamDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jisce R PuikDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Stephanie M Fraga RodriguesDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Laura L MeijerDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Tessa Y S Le LargeDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marc G BesselinkImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Luca MorelliGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Adam FramptonDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elisa GiovannettiLaboratory of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Geert KazemierDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Accurate risk prediction models using routinely measured biomarkers-eg, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and bilirubin serum levels-for pancreatic cancer could facilitate early detection of pancreatic cancer and prevent potentially unnecessary diagnostic tests for patients at low risk. An externally validated model using CA19-9 and bilirubin serum levels in a larger cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer or benign periampullary diseases is needed. Objective: To assess the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of a prediction model using readily available blood biomarkers (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 [CA19-9] and bilirubin) to distinguish early-stage pancreatic cancer from benign periampullary diseases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study used data from 4 academic hospitals in Italy, the Netherlands, and the UK on adult patients with pancreatic cancer or benign periampullary disease treated from 2014 to 2022. Analyses were conducted from September 2022 to February 2023. Exposures: Serum levels of CA19-9 and bilirubin from samples collected at diagnosis and before start of any medical intervention. Main Outcomes and Measures: Discrimination (measured by the area under the curve [AUC]), calibration, and clinical utility of the prediction model and the biomarkers, separately. Results: The study sample comprised 249 patients in the development cohort (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 67 [11] years; 112 [45%] female individuals), and 296 patients in the validation cohort (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 68 [12] years; 157 [53%] female individuals). At external validation, the prediction model showed an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84-0.93) for early-stage pancreatic cancer vs benign periampullary diseases, and outperformed CA19-9 (difference in AUC [ΔAUC], 0.10; 95% CI, 0.06-0.14; P < .001) and bilirubin (∆AUC, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.12; P = .004). In the subset of patients without elevated tumor marker levels (CA19-9 <37 U/mL), the model showed an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92). At a risk threshold of 30%, decision curve analysis indicated that performing biopsies based on the prediction model was equivalent to reducing the biopsy procedure rate by 6% (95% CI, 1%-11%), without missing early-stage pancreatic cancer in patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this diagnostic study of patients with pancreatic cancer or benign periampullary diseases, an easily applicable risk score showed high accuracy for distinguishing early-stage pancreatic cancer from benign periampullary diseases. This model could be used to assess the added diagnostic and clinical value of novel biomarkers and prevent potentially unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures for patients at low risk.

Indexed as

CA-19-9 AntigenPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultBilirubinCarbohydratesChildFemaleHumansMaleBilirubinCA-19-9 AntigenCarbohydrates

Identifiers

PMID37639271
PMCPMC10463099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.