ReviewLa Radiologia medica2023
New trend in artificial intelligence-based assistive technology for thoracic imaging.
Review in La Radiologia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative Assistive Technologies for Tetraplegia: A Narrative Review of Systematic and Emerging Evidence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Back to the future in asthma imaging: quantitative assessment and new perspectives.La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- Comprehensive review of pulmonary embolism imaging: past, present and future innovations in computed tomography (CT) and other diagnostic techniques.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Evaluation of AI diagnostic systems for breast ultrasound: comparative analysis with radiologists and the effect of AI assistance.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Review
- AI Revolution in Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine: Transforming and Innovating the Radiological Sciences.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Recent trends in scientific research in chest radiology: What to do or not to do? That is the critical question in research.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- AI-assisted technology optimization in disability support systems using fuzzy rough MABAC decision-making.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent topics in musculoskeletal imaging focused on clinical applications of AI: How should radiologists approach and use AI?La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in fracture detection on radiographs: a literature review.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Advanced imaging techniques and artificial intelligence in pleural diseases: a narrative review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Review
- Smart nanomedicines powered by artificial intelligence: a breakthrough in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Integrating AI and Assistive Technologies in Healthcare: Insights from a Narrative Review of Reviews.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Contrast-enhanced thin-slice abdominal CT with super-resolution deep learning reconstruction technique: evaluation of image quality and visibility of anatomical structures.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- JJR-TOP GUN Phase 1, Year 2: new perspectives through the integration of artificial intelligence and radiology.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Advancing clinical MRI exams with artificial intelligence: Japan's contributions and future prospects.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in interventional oncology: An up-to-date review of the literature.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- All You Need to Know About TACE: A Comprehensive Review of Indications, Techniques, Efficacy, Limits, and Technical Advancement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Data set terminology of deep learning in medicine: a historical review and recommendation.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Overview of Target-Oriented Project Group United for Nippon (TOP GUN): fostering interdisciplinary collaboration among young researchers in radiology on timely topics.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although there is no solid agreement for artificial intelligence (AI), it refers to a computer system with intelligence similar to that of humans. Deep learning appeared in 2006, and more than 10 years have passed since the third AI boom was triggered by improvements in computing power, algorithm development, and the use of big data. In recent years, the application and development of AI technology in the medical field have intensified internationally. There is no doubt that AI will be used in clinical practice to assist in diagnostic imaging in the future. In qualitative diagnosis, it is desirable to develop an explainable AI that at least represents the basis of the diagnostic process. However, it must be kept in mind that AI is a physician-assistant system, and the final decision should be made by the physician while understanding the limitations of AI. The aim of this article is to review the application of AI technology in diagnostic imaging from PubMed database while particularly focusing on diagnostic imaging in thorax such as lesion detection and qualitative diagnosis in order to help radiologists and clinicians to become more familiar with AI in thorax.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.