Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37639026›Full record

ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Explaining radiation dose exposure : The role of the banana equivalent dose compared to the effective dose in patient communication].

T Stein, T Schuermann, F Bamberg, K Mueller-Peltzer

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T SteinAbteilung für Diagnostik und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland. thomas.stein@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
T SchuermannAbteilung für Diagnostik und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.
F BambergAbteilung für Diagnostik und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.
K Mueller-PeltzerAbteilung für Diagnostik und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCommunicating the amount and effects of ionizing radiation to patients prior to an examination using x‑rays is associated with challenges: first, calculating the expected dose prior to the examination and, second, quantifying and illustrating cancer risks. Analogies, such as comparing radiation exposure to accident risks, have limitations and may evoke unease. This study explores and compares two new approaches to discuss radiation exposure from common clinical examinations with patients: effective dose and exposure based on radioactive potassium-40 intake from the ingestion of bananas, the banana equivalent dose (BED). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe effective doses of the diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for computed tomography (CT) and X-ray examinations in adults were calculated using mean conversion factors for specific anatomic body regions. For the BED calculation of the diagnostic reference levels, the radiation dose from a conventional banana ingested over 50 years per becquerel was calculated. The outcomes were juxtaposed against an equivalent number of bananas and its respective radiation doses.

resultsThe calculated doses, namely effective dose and BED, of the German DRL can serve as a reliable metric to discuss radiation exposure from medical imaging with patients prior to an examination.

conclusionThis is the first study to calculate the effective doses of the current DRL and to compare these with the pseudoscientific unit BED. While the BED serves as an interesting illustration to metaphorize radiation exposure, it is recommended to use the calculated effective dose of the DRL as the basis for educational consultations with patients.

Indexed as

MusaRadiation ExposureAdultCommunicationDiagnostic Reference LevelsHumansRadiation, IonizingDiagnostic reference valuesDiagnostic X‑ray radiologyEffective doseEquivalent doseRadiation dose

Identifiers

PMID37639026
OpenAlexW4386209896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.