Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37638973›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2023

Atrial pacing minimization in sinus node dysfunction and risk of incident atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial.

Mads Brix Kronborg, Maria Hee Jung Park Frausing, Jerzy Malczynski, Sam Riahi, Jens Haarbo, Katja Fiedler Holm, Charlotte Ellen Larroudé, Andi Eie Albertsen, Lene Svendstrup, Ulrik Hintze and 8 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Closed loop stimulation reduces the incidence of atrial high-rate episodes compared with conventional rate-adaptive pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunctions.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Minimized atrial pacing and atrial fibrillation burden in the DANPACE II trial.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Atrial resynchronization: an overlooked concept in heart failure and conduction system pacing: review of selected literature with emphasis on atrial anatomy.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Brazilian Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Physiological Pacing: Historical Review With an Eye to the Future.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025
    Review
  14. Minute ventilation sensor-driven rate response as a part of cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization in older patients.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mads Brix KronborgDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle-Juul Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1672-222X
Maria Hee Jung Park FrausingDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle-Juul Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Jerzy MalczynskiDepartment of Cardiology, Goedstrup Hospital, 7400 Herning, Denmark.
Sam RiahiDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1849-9463
Jens HaarboDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, 2900 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Katja Fiedler HolmDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark.
Charlotte Ellen LarroudéDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, 2900 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andi Eie AlbertsenDepartment of Cardiology, Viborg Hospital, 8800 Viborg, Denmark.
Lene SvendstrupDepartment of Cardiology, Aabenraa Hospital, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark.
Ulrik HintzeDepartment of Cardiology, Esbjerg Hospital, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark.
Ole Dyg PedersenDepartment of Cardiology, Roskilde Hospital, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Ulla DavidsenDepartment of Cardiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas FischerDepartment of Cardiology, Vejle Hospital, 7100 Vejle, Denmark.
Jens Brock JohansenDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7157-7948
Jens KristensenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle-Juul Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9784-3554
Christian GerdesDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle-Juul Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Jens Cosedis NielsenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle-Juul Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0631-0010
DANPACE II Investigators

Funding

BiotronikBoston ScientificDanish Heart Foundation 13-04-R94_A4523-22757Danish PacemakerICDIndependent Research Fund Denmark 4183-00251BKaren Elise Jensen's FoundationMedtronic, and St. Jude MedicalNilssons Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsHigh percentages of atrial pacing have been associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. This study is aimed at evaluating whether atrial pacing minimization in patients with sinus node dysfunction reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation.

methodsIn a nationwide, randomized controlled trial, 540 patients with sinus node dysfunction and an indication for first pacemaker implantation were assigned to pacing programmed to a base rate of 60 bpm and rate-adaptive pacing (DDDR-60) or pacing programmed to a base rate of 40 bpm without rate-adaptive pacing (DDD-40). Patients were followed on remote monitoring for 2 years. The primary endpoint was time to first episode of atrial fibrillation longer than 6 min. Secondary endpoints included longer episodes of atrial fibrillation, and the safety endpoint comprised a composite of syncope or presyncope.

resultsThe median percentage of atrial pacing was 1% in patients assigned to DDD-40 and 49% in patients assigned to DDDR-60. The primary endpoint occurred in 124 patients (46%) in each treatment group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.25, P = .83). There were no between-group differences in atrial fibrillation exceeding 6 or 24 h, persistent atrial fibrillation, or cardioversions for atrial fibrillation. The incidence of syncope or presyncope was higher in patients assigned to DDD-40 (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.13-2.59, P = .01).

conclusionsAtrial pacing minimization in patients with sinus node dysfunction does not reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Programming a base rate of 40 bpm without rate-adaptive pacing is associated with an increased risk of syncope or presyncope.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCardiac Pacing, ArtificialSick Sinus SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPacemaker, ArtificialSyncopeAtrial fibrillationAtrial pacingPacemakerQuality of lifeSinus node diseaseSyncope

Identifiers

PMID37638973
PMCPMC10590128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.