Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37638638›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2023

Cleaning Up without Messing Up: Maximizing the Benefits of Plastic Clean-Up Technologies through New Regulatory Approaches.

Jannike Falk-Andersson, Idun Rognerud, Hannah De Frond, Giulia Leone, Rachel Karasik, Zoie Diana, Hanna Dijkstra, Justine Ammendolia, Marcus Eriksen, Ria Utz and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jannike Falk-AnderssonNorwegian Institute for Water Research, Økernveien 94, 0579 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5495-1309
Idun RognerudNorwegian Institute for Water Research, Økernveien 94, 0579 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0357-837X
Hannah De FrondUniversity of Toronto Trash Team, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1199-0727
Giulia LeoneGhent University, Research Group Aquatic Ecology, Coupure links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2906-6815
Rachel KarasikNicholas Institute for Energy, Environment & Sustainability, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2420-8418
Zoie DianaDivision of Marine Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University Marine Laboratory, Duke University, Beaufort, North Carolina 27708, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5997-4238
Hanna DijkstraInstitute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1111, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7010-7589
Justine AmmendoliaSchool for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5750-1103
Marcus EriksenThe 5 Gyres Institute, Los Angeles, California 90409, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9453-5492
Ria UtzSciences Po Paris, 27, rue Saint-Guillaume, 75007, Paris, France.ORCID 0009-0007-7667-262X
Tony R WalkerSchool for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9008-0697
Kathinka FürstNorwegian Institute for Water Research, Økernveien 94, 0579 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8444-428X

Funding

Duke University Program in Environmental HealthT32ES021432 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Akhenaton-Andrew Dhafir Jones, Joel Newman Meyer · 2013 to 2026
$4.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES021432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the global plastics crisis grows, numerous technologies have been invented and implemented to recover plastic pollution from the environment. Although laudable, unregulated clean-up technologies may be inefficient and have unintended negative consequences on ecosystems, for example, through bycatch or removal of organic matter important for ecosystem functions. Despite these concerns, plastic clean-up technologies can play an important role in reducing litter in the environment. As the United Nations Environment Assembly is moving toward an international, legally binding treaty to address plastic pollution by 2024, the implementation of plastic clean-up technologies should be regulated to secure their net benefits and avoid unintended damages. Regulation can require environmental impact assessments and life cycle analysis to be conducted predeployment on a case-by-case basis to determine their effectiveness and impact and secure environmentally sound management. During operations catch-efficiency and bycatch of nonlitter items, as well as waste management of recovered litter, should be documented. Data collection for monitoring, research, and outreach to mitigate plastic pollution is recommended as added value of implementation of clean-up technologies.

Indexed as

EcosystemWaste ManagementEnvironmental PollutionPlasticsTechnologyPlasticsadded valuebycatchclean-up technologyexternalitieslitterplastic pollutionplastics treatyregulations

Identifiers

PMID37638638
PMCPMC10501118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.