Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37638548›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

Evaluation of Feasibility and Acceptability of a Text-Messaging Intervention for Tobacco Cessation in India.

Abhijit Nadkarni, Leena Gaikwad, Miriam Sequeira, Richard Velleman, Joseline D'souza, Ankita Hoble, Rajanish Haldankar, Pratima Murthy, Felix Naughton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Behavioral Interventions for Tobacco Cessation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Systematic Development of a Mobile Phone Delivered Text-Messaging Tobacco Cessation Intervention in India.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Qualitative research in oral health in India: A bibliometric analysis.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abhijit NadkarniCentre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5832-5236
Leena GaikwadAddictions and Related Research Group (ARG), Sangath, India.
Miriam SequeiraAddictions and Related Research Group (ARG), Sangath, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3764-3934
Richard VellemanAddictions and Related Research Group (ARG), Sangath, India.
Joseline D'souzaAddictions and Related Research Group (ARG), Sangath, India.
Ankita HobleAddictions and Related Research Group (ARG), Sangath, India.
Rajanish HaldankarAddictions and Related Research Group (ARG), Sangath, India.
Pratima MurthyNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.
Felix NaughtonSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9790-2796

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R018456/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of our study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a brief behavioral intervention for tobacco cessation delivered via mobile phone text messaging in India. AIMS AND

methodsWe conducted an uncontrolled intervention cohort study in adult current users of tobacco. The participants received intervention messages on their mobile phones for eight weeks. We collected qualitative data about participants' perceptions of intervention delivery and receipt, acceptability, and feasibility of the intervention. The outcomes measured at 3 months post-recruitment were self-reported 7- and 28-day point-prevalence abstinence, and Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) risk categories for tobacco-low (0-3), moderate (4-26), and high (≥27).

resultsWe recruited 26 eligible participants, and 22 completed the outcome assessments. The participants generally perceived the intervention content to be simple to access and useful in facilitating a change in tobacco use. None of the participants indicated that they wanted to discontinue receiving the intervention messages. Some suggestions for enhancing acceptability included supplementing text messaging with more intensive counseling and the use of multimedia content. Eighteen percent of participants reported abstinence in the past 7 and 28 days. A greater proportion of those who used smokeless tobacco were abstinent at follow-up compared to those who smoked (42.9% vs. 6.7%; p = .04).

conclusionsIf effective, simple and low-cost mobile phone text messaging can be used to deliver interventions for tobacco use, and has the potential to be scaled up so it can be delivered to populations of smokers interested in receiving cessation support. IMPLICATIONS: Our study is an important step towards the development of a contextually relevant intervention suited for low- and middle-income countries and which is responsive to the needs of both those who use smoked and smokeless tobacco. If found to be effective, our intervention would be a scalable solution to overcome the human resource related barrier to accessing tobacco cessation services in low resource settings.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationText MessagingTobacco Use CessationAdultCohort StudiesFeasibility StudiesHumansTobacco Products

Identifiers

PMID37638548
PMCPMC10734385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.