Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37638316›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

SPIDEN: deep Spiking Neural Networks for efficient image denoising.

Andrea Castagnetti, Alain Pegatoquet, Benoît Miramond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea CastagnettiUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, LEAT, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Alain PegatoquetUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, LEAT, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Benoît MiramondUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, LEAT, Sophia Antipolis, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) have outreached the performance of classical algorithms for image restoration tasks. However, most of these methods are not suited for computational efficiency. In this work, we investigate Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) for the specific and uncovered case of image denoising, with the goal of reaching the performance of conventional DCNN while reducing the computational cost. This task is challenging for two reasons. First, as denoising is a regression task, the network has to predict a continuous value (i.e., the noise amplitude) for each pixel of the image, with high precision. Moreover, state of the art results have been obtained with deep networks that are notably difficult to train in the spiking domain. To overcome these issues, we propose a formal analysis of the information conversion processing carried out by the Integrate and Fire (IF) spiking neurons and we formalize the trade-off between conversion error and activation sparsity in SNNs. We then propose, for the first time, an image denoising solution based on SNNs. The SNN networks are trained directly in the spike domain using surrogate gradient learning and backpropagation through time. Experimental results show that the proposed SNN provides a level of performance close to the state of the art with CNN based solutions. Specifically, our SNN achieves 30.18 dB of signal-to-noise ratio on the Set12 dataset, which is only 0.25 dB below the performance of the equivalent DCNN. Moreover we show that this performance can be achieved with low latency, i.e., using few timesteps, and with a significant level of sparsity. Finally, we analyze the energy consumption for different network latencies and network sizes. We show that the energy consumption of SNNs increases with longer latencies, making them more energy efficient compared to CNNs only for very small inference latencies. However, we also show that by increasing the network size, SNNs can provide competitive denoising performance while reducing the energy consumption by 20%.

Indexed as

denoisingdirect trainingenergy consumptionlow latencyquantization errorsparsitySpiking Neural Networks

Identifiers

PMID37638316
PMCPMC10450950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.