Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37638240›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2021

Clinical Impact of Stump Closure Reinforced With Hemopatch on the Prevention of Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Selman Uranues, Abraham Fingerhut, Orlin Belyaev, Alessandro Zerbi, Ugo Boggi, Matthias W Hoffmann, Daniel Reim, Alessandro Esposito, Florian Primavesi, Peter Kornprat and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. HemopatchUpdates in surgery · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Selman UranuesFrom the Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Abraham FingerhutFrom the Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Orlin BelyaevKlinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie St. Josef-Hospital, Bochum, Germany.
Alessandro ZerbiPancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy.
Ugo BoggiDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Matthias W HoffmannDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Raphaelsklinik Münster, Münster, Germany.
Daniel ReimKlinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Alessandro EspositoDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery-Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Florian PrimavesiDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Peter KornpratClinical Division of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Roberto CoppolaDepartment of Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Georgio P Fragulidis2nd Department of Surgery "Aretaieio" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Mario Serradilla-MartinDepartment of Surgery, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Orhan AlimogluDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University Goztepe Training & Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Andrea PeriGeneral Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Bogdan DiaconescuAnatomy Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Medical University of Graz · ATRuijin Hospital · CNUniversity of Pisa · ITCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROHumanitas University · ITInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón · ESIstanbul Medeniyet University · TRKlinikum rechts der Isar · DENational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRRaphaelsklinik Münster · DESt. Josef-Hospital · DEUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most dreaded complication after distal pancreatectomy (DP). This multicenter randomized trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of Hemopatch in preventing clinically relevant (grades B/C according to the ISGPS classification) POPF after DP. Material and methods: After stump closure, patients were randomized to affix Hemopatch to the stump or not. Statistical significance was set at 0.025. Clinical significance was defined as the number of patients needed to treat (NNT) to avoid 1 B/C POPF. Results: Of 631 eligible patients, 360 were randomized and 315 analyzed per protocol (155 in the standard closure group; 160 in the Hemopatch group). The rates of B/C POPF (the primary endpoint) were 23.2% and 16.3% ( Conclusion: The results of the first randomized trial evaluating Hemopatch-reinforced pancreatic stump after DP to prevent type B/C POPF do not allow us to conclude that the risk of B/C POPF was lower. Based on the NNT, however, routine use of Hemopatch after DP may result in fewer complications (including POPF) overall, especially in cases with hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic stump or main pancreatic duct.

Identifiers

PMID37638240
PMCPMC10455066
OpenAlexW3129797680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.