Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37638173›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Tunneled antibiotic-impregnated vs. bolt-connected, non-coated external ventricular drainage: a comparison of complications.

Celia Ortega-Angulo, Ana Royuela, Teresa Kalantari, Gregorio Rodríguez-Boto, Raquel Gutierrez-Gonzalez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Celia Ortega-AnguloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla, Madrid, Spain.
Ana RoyuelaBiostatistics Unit, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Biomedical Research Institute Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria Puerta de Hierro - Segovia de Arana, Consorcio de Investigación Biomèdica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain.
Teresa KalantariDepartment of Neurosurgery, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Gregorio Rodríguez-BotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Raquel Gutierrez-GonzalezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESHospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a common emergency neurosurgical procedure, but it is not free of adverse events. The aim of this study is to compare the complication rate of two frequently used EVD types, namely, tunneled antibiotic-impregnated catheters (Bactiseal Methods: All EVDs placed between 1 March 2015 and 31 December 2017 were registered. Procedures performed with any catheter different from Bactiseal Results: A total of 77 EVDs were finally considered for analysis (40 Bactiseal Conclusion: No significant differences were observed regarding infection, hemorrhage, obstruction, malposition, involuntary catheter pull-out, and the need for EVD replacement when comparing non-impregnated bolt-connected EVDs (Camino

Indexed as

anti-bacterial agentsdrainageexternal ventricular drainpost-operative complicationsventriculostomy

Identifiers

PMID37638173
PMCPMC10457002
OpenAlexW4385755399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.