ArticleInfection and drug resistance2023
Development and Application of a Reference Manual for Diagnosis and Rational Use of Antimicrobial Agents for Outpatient Primary Care (Digestive System Part): A Delphi Study.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To establish a concise and easy-to-understand reference manual for outpatient primary care providers, promoting correct diagnosis of digestive system diseases and rational antimicrobial use. Methods: The establishment of the manual encompassed two processes: the development of a draft manual and the validation of the manual. The development process was based on a literature review and expert discussion. The manual comprises portions for disease diagnosis and rationality of antimicrobial use. The validation process employed a two-round Delphi technique, collecting consensus through paper-based or mail-based communications. The response of the Delphi group was assessed by the level of authority and commitment of the panelists and the degree of agreement among them. Furthermore, the manual was preliminarily applied among primary care physicians. Results: A total of 29 panelists completed the Delphi working process. They were authoritative in their professional fields with authority coefficients of 0.813 and 0.818 for the two portions of the manual, respectively. The level of commitment of the panelists was measured by response rates, which were 100.00% and 96.67% for Round 1 and 2. After two rounds, a consensus was achieved with the consensus rates for the two portions of the manual being greater than 65% and 70%, respectively. Kendall Conclusion: Based on a collective consensus of professionals, a reference manual has been established, to provide a concise and easy-to-understand guide specifically for physicians and pharmacists in outpatient primary care. It could facilitate rapid learning to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment for digestive disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.