Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637929›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Profiles of parents' emotion socialization within a multinational sample of parents.

Gabriella L King, Jacqui A Macdonald, Christopher J Greenwood, Christiane Kehoe, Julie C Dunsmore, Sophie S Havighurst, George J Youssef, Tomer S Berkowitz, Elizabeth M Westrupp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Extent to Which Policies Are Supporting Families to Improve Child Mental Health Outcomes in Victoria, Australia: A Policy Scoping Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriella L KingSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Jacqui A MacdonaldSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Christopher J GreenwoodCentre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Christiane KehoeMindful, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Julie C DunsmoreHuman Development and Family Sciences, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Sophie S HavighurstMindful, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
George J YoussefSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Tomer S BerkowitzSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Elizabeth M WestruppSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Deakin University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AULa Trobe University · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Seminal emotion socialization theories classify parents according to two patterns of parent emotion socialization processes: 'emotion coaching' (i.e., parents validate and teach children about emotions) versus 'emotion dismissing' parenting (i.e., parents minimize and dismiss their children's emotions). However, empirical evidence supporting this binary distinction of parents remains limited. Our objective was to investigate whether parents can be differentiated by distinct patterns in their (1) beliefs about children's emotions, (2) emotion regulation, and (3) emotion-related parenting practices. Method: Participants were parents of children aged 4-10 years from the Child and Parent Emotion Study ( Results: A three-profile model emerged characterizing parents by: (1) emotion coaching; (2) emotion dismissing; (3) emotion disengaged. There was strong support for construct validity and reliability. Discussion: Our study provides empirical support for distinct differentiated classifications of emotion coaching and emotion dismissing parenting, aligned with emotion socialization theories. We further extend on extant theory and suggest a third 'emotion disengaged' classification, describing parents with moderate levels of emotion dismissing parenting and low levels of emotion coaching parenting. It should be noted that the profiles were derived with self-report data, therefore, data may have been biased by contextual factors. Furthermore, the study sample consisted of Western families from affluent backgrounds. The field should focus efforts on conducting person-centered studies with more diverse samples in future.

Indexed as

child emotion developmentemotion socializationlatent profile analysismeta-emotion theorymultiple-group latent profile analysis

Identifiers

PMID37637929
PMCPMC10447894
OpenAlexW4385738609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.