Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637920›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2023

Emotional freedom techniques for treating post traumatic stress disorder: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peta Stapleton, Kevin Kip, Dawson Church, Loren Toussaint, Jacqui Footman, Pat Ballantyne, Tom O'Keefe

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Characteristics and Treatment of Cyberviolence Trauma in Children and Adolescents.Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peta StapletonSchool of Psychology, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Kevin KipHealth Services Division, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Dawson ChurchNational Institute for Integrative Healthcare, Fulton, CA, United States.
Loren ToussaintDepartment of Psychology, Luther College, Decorah, IA, United States.
Jacqui FootmanEFT International, Tiverton, Devon, United Kingdom.
Pat BallantyneEFT International, Tiverton, Devon, United Kingdom.
Tom O'KeefeSchool of Psychology, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) is a psychophysiological intervention that includes cognitive and somatic elements, utilizing techniques from both Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Prolonged Exposure therapy (PE). Because only a single meta-analysis existed examining EFT for PTSD, this systematic review and meta-analysis represents an update. Method: Ten databases were searched for quantitative reviews and randomised clinical trials, and six met inclusion criteria. Results: Study quality and effect size were evaluated and the results demonstrated that treatment with Clinical EFT, when compared to wait list, usual care, or no treatment controls, resulted in significant and large effect sizes, ranging from 1.38 to 2.51. When compared to active controls, effect sizes ranged from -0.15 to 0.79, producing treatment results similar to other evidence-based therapies. Discussion: Limitations are presented and considerations for further research are proposed.

Indexed as

emotional freedom techniquesempirically supported treatmentevidence-basedPTSDtrauma

Identifiers

PMID37637920
PMCPMC10447981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.