Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637880›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2021

The Prognostic Value of Total Tumor Volume Response Compared With RECIST1.1 in Patients With Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Systemic Treatment.

Nina J Wesdorp, Karen Bolhuis, Joran Roor, Jan-Hein T M van Waesberghe, Susan van Dieren, Martin J van Amerongen, Thiery Chapelle, Cornelis H C Dejong, Marc R W Engelbrecht, Michael F Gerhards and 17 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02162563 (Treatment Strategies in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Initially Unresectable Liver-only Metastases CAIRO5 a Randomized Phase 3 Study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02162563 phase3completednot on this map

Treatment Strategies in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Initially Unresectable Liver-only Metastases CAIRO5 a Randomized Phase 3 Study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDutch Colorectal Cancer GroupRan2014 to 2025Enrolled530ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Liver MetastasesArmsFOLFOX/ FOLFIRI with bevacizumab, FOLFOXIRI with bevacizumab, FOLFOX/ FOLFIRI with panitumumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

Nina J WesdorpFrom the Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karen BolhuisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joran RoorDepartment of Health, SAS Institute B.V., Huizen, The Netherlands.
Jan-Hein T M van WaesbergheDepartment of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Susan van DierenDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin J van AmerongenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Thiery ChapelleDepartment of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Cornelis H C DejongDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marc R W EngelbrechtDepartment of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael F GerhardsDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dirk GrunhagenDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas M van GulikDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
John J HermansDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Koert P de JongDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joost M KlaaseDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mike S L LiemDepartment of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Krijn P van LiendenDepartment of Interventional Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
I Quintus MolenaarDepartment of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Gijs A PatijnDepartment of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Arjen M RijkenDepartment of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Theo M RuersDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes H W de WiltDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rutger-Jan SwijnenburgDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis J A PuntDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost HuiskensDepartment of Health, SAS Institute B.V., Huizen, The Netherlands.
Geert KazemierFrom the Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLAntwerp University Hospital · BEErasmus MC · NLIsala · NLMaastricht University · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Compare total tumor volume (TTV) response after systemic treatment to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1) and assess the prognostic value of TTV change and RECIST1.1 for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with colorectal liver-only metastases (CRLM). Background: RECIST1.1 provides unidimensional criteria to evaluate tumor response to systemic therapy. Those criteria are accepted worldwide but are limited by interobserver variability and ignore potentially valuable information about TTV. Methods: Patients with initially unresectable CRLM receiving systemic treatment from the randomized, controlled CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included. TTV response was assessed using software specifically developed together with SAS analytics. Baseline and follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans were used to calculate RECIST1.1 and TTV response to systemic therapy. Different thresholds (10%, 20%, 40%) were used to define response of TTV as no standard currently exists. RFS was assessed in a subgroup of patients with secondarily resectable CRLM after induction treatment. Results: A total of 420 CT scans comprising 7820 CRLM in 210 patients were evaluated. In 30% to 50% (depending on chosen TTV threshold) of patients, discordance was observed between RECIST1.1 and TTV change. A TTV decrease of >40% was observed in 47 (22%) patients who had stable disease according to RECIST1.1. In 118 patients with secondarily resectable CRLM, RFS was shorter for patients with less than 10% TTV decrease compared with patients with more than 10% TTV decrease ( Conclusions: TTV response assessment shows prognostic potential in the evaluation of systemic therapy response in patients with CRLM.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerliver metastasesRECISTresectionsystemic therapytumor response assessmenttumor volume

Identifiers

PMID37637880
PMCPMC10455281
OpenAlexW3209086291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.