Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637877›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2021

Indication of Proximal Gastrectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Based on Lymph Node Metastasis at the Distal Part of the Stomach.

Sejin Lee, Won Jeong Son, Yun Ho Roh, Jeong Ho Song, Sung Hyun Park, Minah Cho, Yoo Min Kim, Woo Jin Hyung, Hyoung-Il Kim

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06614439 (Proximal Versus Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06614439 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Proximal Versus Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Double-Center Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled96ConditionsGastric Adenocarcinoma, GastrectomyArmsproximal gastrectomy, total gastrectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gastric cancer surgery in South Korea: Past, present, and future.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sejin LeeFrom the Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won Jeong SonBiostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yun Ho RohBiostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Ho SongFrom the Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Hyun ParkFrom the Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Minah ChoFrom the Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yoo Min KimFrom the Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woo Jin HyungFrom the Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyoung-Il KimFrom the Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To suggest the possible indication of proximal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer located at the upper third of the stomach. Background: Proximal gastrectomy has been an alternative surgical procedure for early proximal gastric cancer due to its benefits for quality of life while maintaining oncological outcomes. However, the oncological safety of proximal gastrectomy for advanced tumors remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 878 patients who underwent radical total gastrectomy from 2003 to 2018 for pathologic T2-T4 gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. We identified risk factors for lymph node metastasis at the distal part of the stomach, which was not dissected in proximal gastrectomy. Subsequently, we evaluated the metastasis rate and therapeutic value index of lymph nodes at the distal part of the stomach in patients with none of these risk factors. Results: Multivariable analysis revealed that esophagogastric junction (EGJ)-tumor epicenter distance >30 mm, tumor size >70 mm, macroscopic type IV tumor, and serosal invasion were risk factors for lymph node metastasis at the distal stomach. In patients without risk factors, the therapeutic value index for any lymph nodes at the distal stomach was 0.8, suggesting that lymph node dissection could be omitted in these patients. Conclusions: EGJ-tumor epicenter distance ≤ 30 mm, tumor size ≤ 70 mm, not a macroscopic type IV tumor, and no serosal invasion could be an indication of proximal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer located at the upper third of the stomach.

Identifiers

PMID37637877
PMCPMC10455053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.