Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637797›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Development and reliability testing of an audit toolbox for the assessment of the physical activity friendliness of urban and rural environments in Germany.

Christina Müller, Bruno Domokos, Tanja Amersbach, Eva-Maria Hausmayer, Christin Roßmann, Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich, Jens Bucksch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measuring Street Built Environments for Children's Use: A Systematic Review of Measurement Tools.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christina MüllerInstitute of Sport Science, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Bruno DomokosInstitute of Sport Science, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Tanja AmersbachInstitute of Sport Science, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Eva-Maria HausmayerInstitute of Sport Science, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Christin RoßmannFederal Centre for Health Education, Cologne, Germany.
Birgit Wallmann-SperlichInstitute of Sport Science, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Jens BuckschDepartment of Prevention and Health Promotion, Faculty of Natural and Sociological Sciences, Heidelberg University of Education, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DEFederal Centre for Health Education · DEHeidelberg University of Education · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: According to socio-ecological theories, physical activity behaviors are linked to the physical and social neighborhood environment. Reliable and contextually adapted instruments are needed to assess environmental characteristics related to physical activity. This work aims to develop an audit toolbox adapted to the German context, to urban and rural settings, for different population groups, and different types of physical activity; and to evaluate its inter-rater reliability. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search to collect existing audit tools and to identify the latest evidence of environmental factors influencing physical activity in general, as well as in German populations. The results guided the construction of a category system for the toolbox. Items were assigned to the categories based on their relevance to physical activity and to the German context as well as their comprehensibility. We piloted the toolbox in different urban and rural areas (100 street segments, 15 parks, and 21 playgrounds) and calculated inter-rater reliability by Cohen's Kappa. Results: The audit toolbox comprises a basic streetscape audit with seven categories (land use and destinations, traffic safety, pedestrian infrastructure, cycling infrastructure, attractiveness, social environment, and subjective assessment), as well as supplementary tools for children and adolescents, seniors and people with impaired mobility, parks and public open spaces, playgrounds, and rural areas. 76 % of all included items had moderate, substantial, or almost perfect inter-rater reliability (κ > 0.4). Conclusions: The audit toolbox is an innovative and reliable instrument for the assessment of the physical activity friendliness of urban and rural environments in Germany.

Indexed as

EnvironmentSocial EnvironmentAdolescentChildExerciseGermanyHumansReproducibility of Resultsbuilt environmentphysical activityreliabilityruralurbanwalkability

Identifiers

PMID37637797
PMCPMC10449332
OpenAlexW4385718368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.