Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637777›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2023

Animal model for tendinopathy.

Junchao Luo, Zetao Wang, Chenqi Tang, Zi Yin, Jiayun Huang, Dengfeng Ruan, Yang Fei, Canlong Wang, Xianan Mo, Jiajin Li and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cyclic mechanical stimulation of TDCs improves tendon tissue maturationFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junchao LuoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zetao WangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chenqi TangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zi YinOrthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jiayun HuangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Dengfeng RuanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yang FeiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Canlong WangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xianan MoDr. Li Dak Sum and Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiajin LiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Cailian FangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jianyou LiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiao ChenOrthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Weiliang ShenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhejiang Lab · CNHuzhou University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tendinopathy is a common motor system disease that leads to pain and reduced function. Despite its prevalence, our mechanistic understanding is incomplete, leading to limited efficacy of treatment options. Animal models contribute significantly to our understanding of tendinopathy and some therapeutic options. However, the inadequacies of animal models are also evident, largely due to differences in anatomical structure and the complexity of human tendinopathy. Different animal models reproduce different aspects of human tendinopathy and are therefore suitable for different scenarios. This review aims to summarize the existing animal models of tendinopathy and to determine the situations in which each model is appropriate for use, including exploring disease mechanisms and evaluating therapeutic effects. Methods: We reviewed relevant literature in the PubMed database from January 2000 to December 2022 using the specific terms ((tendinopathy) OR (tendinitis)) AND (model) AND ((mice) OR (rat) OR (rabbit) OR (lapin) OR (dog) OR (canine) OR (sheep) OR (goat) OR (horse) OR (equine) OR (pig) OR (swine) OR (primate)). This review summarized different methods for establishing animal models of tendinopathy and classified them according to the pathogenesis they simulate. We then discussed the advantages and disadvantages of each model, and based on this, identified the situations in which each model was suitable for application. Results: For studies that aim to study the pathophysiology of tendinopathy, naturally occurring models, treadmill models, subacromial impingement models and metabolic models are ideal. They are closest to the natural process of tendinopathy in humans. For studies that aim to evaluate the efficacy of possible treatments, the selection should be made according to the pathogenesis simulated by the modeling method. Existing tendinopathy models can be classified into six types according to the pathogenesis they simulate: extracellular matrix synthesis-decomposition imbalance, inflammation, oxidative stress, metabolic disorder, traumatism and mechanical load. Conclusions: The critical factor affecting the translational value of research results is whether the selected model is matched with the research purpose. There is no single optimal model for inducing tendinopathy, and researchers must select the model that is most appropriate for the study they are conducting. The translational potential of this article: The critical factor affecting the translational value of research results is whether the animal model used is compatible with the research purpose. This paper provides a rationale and practical guide for the establishment and selection of animal models of tendinopathy, which is helpful to improve the clinical transformation ability of existing models and develop new models.

Indexed as

Animal modelPathogenesisTendinopathyTendonTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID37637777
PMCPMC10450357
OpenAlexW4385824597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.