Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637738›Full record

ReviewACS central science2023

Robotic Modules for the Programmable Chemputation of Molecules and Materials.

Daniel Salley, J Sebastián Manzano, Philip J Kitson, Leroy Cronin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS central science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Data-Driven Polyoxometalate Chemistry.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel SalleySchool of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.
J Sebastián ManzanoSchool of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2016-8380
Philip J KitsonSchool of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.
Leroy CroninSchool of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8035-5757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before leveraging big data methods like machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) in chemistry, there is an imperative need for an affordable, universal digitization standard. This mirrors the foundational requisites of the digital revolution, which demanded standard architectures with precise specifications. Recently, we have developed automated platforms tailored for chemical AI-driven exploration, including the synthesis of molecules, materials, nanomaterials, and formulations. Our focus has been on designing and constructing affordable standard hardware and software modules that serve as a blueprint for chemistry digitization across varied fields. Our platforms can be categorized into four types based on their applications: (i) discovery systems for the exploration of chemical space and novel reactivity, (ii) systems for the synthesis and manufacture of fine chemicals, (iii) platforms for formulation discovery and exploration, and (iv) systems for materials discovery and synthesis. We also highlight the convergent evolution of these platforms through shared hardware, firmware, and software alongside the creation of a unique programming language for chemical and material systems. This programming approach is essential for reliable synthesis, designing experiments, discovery, optimization, and establishing new collaboration standards. Furthermore, it is crucial for verifying literature findings, enhancing experimental outcome reliability, and fostering collaboration and sharing of unsuccessful experiments across different research labs.

Identifiers

PMID37637738
PMCPMC10450877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.