Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637602›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Management Dilemma: Is Enucleation With Lymphadenectomy a Viable Choice for Large Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (p-NETs)?

Vinay Kumar, Neelesh Shrivastava, Suprateek Saha, Sonveer Gautam, Bharati Pandya

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vinay KumarDepartment of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.
Neelesh ShrivastavaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.
Suprateek SahaDepartment of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.
Sonveer GautamDepartment of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.
Bharati PandyaDepartment of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) has gradually taken a trend toward conservative management owing to its slow-growing and prolonged course. Though clear criteria exist regarding managing small tumors, the direction of a large tumor remains a dilemma. We present a case of a young 26-year-old lactating woman with a large 3.4 cm × 3.2 cm mass in the uncinate process, which is adjacent to the inferior vena cava (IVC) and has flimsy adhesions to the duodenum. She also had an enhancing adjacent lymph node measuring 1.2 cm × 0.7 cm, which showed enhancement with Ga-68 DOTANOC positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and raised serum gastrin levels. The dilemma was between pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or enucleation with lymphadenectomy (EL). Finally, EL was conducted. We discussed this case with relevant studies, which we had referred to because large-sized tumors are not usually enucleated.

Indexed as

distal pancreatectomy (dp)enucleation with lymphadenectomy (el)gastrinomapancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pnets)pancreatico-duodenectomy (pd)

Identifiers

PMID37637602
PMCPMC10452049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.