ReviewCureus2023
Medico-Legal Implications and Regulatory Frameworks of Regenerative Orthopaedics.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Super-Speciality in India: A Boon or Bane?Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regenerative orthopaedics has revolutionized traditional medicine, which represents a giant leap in science and research. The knowledge of the medico-legal implications and regulatory framework of this branch is vital for clinicians and researchers to go forward smoothly. This systematic review of the literature should shed light on these considerations and provide a comprehensive knowledge of the various implications and laws governing practice and research. The wide plethora of knowledge in the use of regenerative orthopaedics should be complemented by updated regulations and clinicians' grasp of knowledge on regenerative medicine. The review focused on peer-reviewed published articles concerned with the topic and outlined common medico-legal issues and the current regulatory frameworks in various countries. The articles suggest that developed nations like the US have faced several lawsuits in this field, and a few countries in Europe like Italy and Germany, which were frontrunners in this field based on research, have fallen back due to emerging legal and regulatory policies. Undoubtedly, regenerative orthopaedics holds the key to future orthopaedics, but the world is skeptical of this concept, and laws and regulatory frameworks can curb it if not guided well. In India, this field has received prime attention, but at a slow pace when compared to the laws. After reviewing 113 articles, we analysed eight critically in this systematic review to emphasize the comparative global frameworks, daily medico-legal problems, and solutions for the branch of regenerative orthopaedics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.