Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637515›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Preoperative CT-Guided Coil Localization of Lung Nodule Resection: A Single-Center Experience.

Sawsan A Kadhem, Prapul Rajendran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sawsan A KadhemRadiology, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Prapul RajendranRadiology, National University Hospital, Singapore, SGP.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increased use of computed tomography (CT) for lung cancer screening has led to an increase in the incidence of lung nodules. However, accurately localizing small or deep-seated nodules remains challenging and often requires image-guided techniques. CT-guided coil localization has emerged as a popular method for precise localization.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of patients who underwent CT-guided coil localization followed by surgical resection of lung nodules at the National University Hospital, Singapore, between 2015 and 2021. The study examined the rates of successful localization, procedural complications, and postoperative length of stay. Descriptive statistics were employed for data analysis.

resultsThis retrospective study included 55 patients with pulmonary nodules, of whom 76.4% had a history of previous malignancy. A total of 58 nodules were successfully localized using coil placement and distributed across various lung lobes. The average dimensions of the nodules were 8.4 ± 3.2 mm × 10.1 ± 4.0 mm, with an average distance of 10.9 ± 9.0 mm from the pleura. Surgical resection of the coiled nodules resulted in an average resected volume of 91.1 ± 76.0 cm

conclusionPreoperative CT-guided coil localization is a reliable and safe technique for accurately localizing lung nodules before surgical resection. The high success rate of this approach enables precise intraoperative planning. Despite procedural complications, their manageable nature and the absence of major adverse events highlight the safety of this technique. Incorporating CT-guided coil localization into routine clinical practice can significantly enhance surgical planning, improve patient outcomes, and optimize resource utilization.

Indexed as

coil localizationcomputed tomographylung noduleretrospective studysafetyvideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID37637515
PMCPMC10457019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.