ArticleIEEE sensors letters2022
Lullaby: A Novel Algorithm to Extract Fetal QRS in Real Time Using Periodic Trend Feature.
Article in IEEE sensors letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fetal heart rate (fHR) is an important indicator for monitoring of fetal cardiac health and development. The widely-used method based on ultrasound, however, is not continuous and often requires an expert to perform; thus, it is mostly used in clinics during checkups. The advances in wearable technology have paved the way for home assessment of fHR via the extraction of the mother's abdominal electrocardiogram (ECG) acquired by novel patches. Several methods have been developed for such; however, the computation is either too slow for real-time monitoring or too heavy to be performed in a wearable. In this work, we develop and validate the Lullaby algorithm - a novel method for fetal QRS extraction from aECG. The results showed that Lullaby is almost 7 times faster than existing methods with a better F1-score of 0.815, holding promise to transform perinatal monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.