Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637434›Full record

ArticleAgronomy for sustainable development2023

A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice.

Xiaoxi Li, Jonathan Storkey, Andrew Mead, Ian Shield, Ian Clark, Richard Ostler, Beth Roberts, Achim Dobermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Agronomy for sustainable development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Measuring the socio-economic and environmental outcomes of regenerative agriculture across spatio-temporal scales.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Sustainable high-yield farming is essential for bending the curve of biodiversity loss.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaoxi LiProtecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, , AL5 2JQ Hertfordshire UK.
Jonathan StorkeyProtecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, , AL5 2JQ Hertfordshire UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1094-8914
Andrew MeadProtecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, , AL5 2JQ Hertfordshire UK.
Ian ShieldProtecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, , AL5 2JQ Hertfordshire UK.
Ian ClarkProtecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, , AL5 2JQ Hertfordshire UK.
Richard OstlerProtecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, , AL5 2JQ Hertfordshire UK.
Beth RobertsProtecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, , AL5 2JQ Hertfordshire UK.
Achim DobermannProtecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, , AL5 2JQ Hertfordshire UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/000I0320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture faces potentially competing societal demands to produce food, fiber and fuel while reducing negative environmental impacts and delivering regulating, supporting and cultural ecosystem services. This necessitates a new generation of long-term agricultural field experiments designed to study the behavior of contrasting cropping systems in terms of multiple outcomes. We document the principles and practices of a new long-term experiment of this type at Rothamsted, established at two contrasting sites in 2017 and 2018, and report initial yield data at the crop and system level. The objective of the Large-Scale Rotation Experiment was to establish gradients of system properties and outcomes to improve our fundamental understanding of UK cropping systems. It is composed of four management factors-phased rotations, cultivation (conventional vs reduced tillage), nutrition (additional organic amendment vs standard mineral fertilization) and crop protection (conventional vs smart crop protection). These factors were combined in a balanced design resulting in 24 emergent cropping systems at each site and can be analyzed at the level of the system or component management factors. We observed interactions between management factors and with the environment on crop yields, justifying the systems level, multi-site approach. Reduced tillage resulted in lower wheat yields but the effect varied with rotation, previous-crop and site. Organic amendments significantly increased spring barley yield by 8% on average though the effect again varied with site. The plowed cropping systems tended to produce higher caloric yield overall than systems under reduced tillage. Additional response variables are being monitored to study synergies and trade-offs with outcomes other than yield at the cropping system level. The experiment has been established as a long-term resource for inter-disciplinary research. By documenting the design process, we aim to facilitate the adoption of similar approaches to system-scale agricultural experimentation to inform the transition to more sustainable cropping systems. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13593-023-00914-8.

Indexed as

Crop protectionCrop rotationLarge-scale rotation experimentOrganic amendmentTillage

Identifiers

PMID37637434
PMCPMC10449994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.