Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637345›Full record

ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2023

Association of a Gamified Journal Club on Internal Medicine Residents' Engagement and Critical Appraisal Skills.

Steven Allon, Alan Baggett, Benjamin Hayes, Katherine Glosemeyer, Jose Cavo, Rami Pacha, Joanna Zurko, Nidhip Patel, Ryan Kraemer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07126314 (Critical Appraisals at Play), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07126314 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Critical Appraisals at Play: Elevating EM Journal Clubs With Team-Based Competition

TypeinterventionalSponsorCommunity Medical Center, Toms River, NJRan2025 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsMedical EducationArmsCompetition based Education Format
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Steven Allonis Assistant Professor of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6905-4830
Alan Baggettis Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham-Huntsville.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7289-1506
Benjamin Hayesis Assistant Professor of Medicine, Northside Hospital Gwinnett.
Katherine Glosemeyeris Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham-Huntsville.
Jose Cavois Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham-Huntsville.
Rami Pachais Assistant Professor of Medicine, Northside Hospital Gwinnett.
Joanna Zurkois Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Wisconsin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9532-4336
Nidhip Patelis Associate Professor of Medicine, Northside Hospital Gwinnett; and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7901-9665
Ryan Kraemeris Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2852-7640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prior literature demonstrates internal medicine residents have suboptimal competence in critical appraisal. Journal clubs are a common intervention to address this skill, but engagement and critical appraisal skill improvement are variable. Objective: We evaluated journal club engagement and critical appraisal skills after implementation of a gamified format. Methods: This was a single-arm study, conducted from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021, involving internal medicine residents at 2 US programs. Residents participated in a 12-month gamified journal club that sorted residents into 2 teams. Residents attended an orientation followed by 6 to 10 monthly, hour-long competitions. In each competition, a subset of the resident teams competed to answer a clinical prompt by critically appraising an original article of their choice. A chief medical resident or faculty member moderated each session and chose the winning team, which received a nominal prize of candy. The primary outcome was engagement, measured by a 7-question survey developed de novo by the authors with Likert scale responses at baseline and 12 months. The secondary outcome was critical appraisal skills assessed by the Berlin Questionnaire. Results: Sixty-one of 72 eligible residents (84.7%) completed both engagement surveys. Residents reported statistically significant improvements in most dimensions of engagement, including a higher likelihood of reading articles before sessions (posttest minus pretest score -1.08; 95% CI -1.34 to -0.82; Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a gamified journal club was associated with improvements in engagement and minimal change in critical appraisal skills.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyFacultyHumansOrganizations

Identifiers

PMID37637345
PMCPMC10449352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.