Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637072›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Concurrent predictors of an immune responsive tumor microenvironment within tumor mutational burden-high breast cancer.

Sarah Sammons, Andrew Elliott, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Saranya Chumsri, Antoinette R Tan, George W Sledge, Sara M Tolaney, Evanthia T Roussos Torres

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah SammonsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
Andrew ElliottClinical and Translational Research, Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Romualdo Barroso-SousaDepartment of Oncology, Dasa Institute for Education and Research (IEPD), Brasilia, Brazil.
Saranya ChumsriDepartment of Hematology Oncology and Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Antoinette R TanLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States.
George W SledgeClinical and Translational Research, Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Sara M TolaneyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
Evanthia T Roussos TorresDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Caris Life Sciences (United States) · USHarvard University · USD’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRLevine Cancer Institute · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Data supporting high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) as a lone biomarker for an immune-responsive tumor microenvironment (TME) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are weak, yet tumor agnostic approval in TMB-H advanced tumors provides immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) as a clinical option. We evaluated concurrent predictors of immune-responsive and non-responsive TME within MBC. Methods: Tumor samples from patients with MBC (N=5621) were analyzed by next-generation sequencing of DNA (592-gene panel or whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). TMB-H threshold was set to ≥ 10 muts/Mb. PDL-1 was evaluated using SP142 antibody. Gene expression profiling and RNA deconvolution were used to estimate immune and stromal cell population abundance in the TME, and transcriptomic signature of immunotherapy response (T cell-inflamed score). Results: 461 (8.2%) TMB-H MBC samples were identified. Consistent with prior studies, TMB-H tumors exhibited significant dMMR/MSI-H enrichment (7 vs. 0%, p<0.0001) and PD-L1+ expression (36 vs. 28%, p<0.05) compared to TMB-L. Across all samples, T cell-inflamed scores were weakly correlated with TMB. TMB-H was not associated with significantly increased immune responsive cell types (CD8+ T-cells, NK cells, or B cells) or immune response gene signatures (e.g. antigen presentation), yet positive trends were observed, while immunosuppressive fibroblasts were significantly decreased in TMB-H tumors (0.84-fold change compared to TMB-L, P<0.05). HR+/HER2- breast cancer was the only subtype in which TMB-H tumors exhibited increased T cell-inflamed scores vs. TMB-L. Concurrent PD-L1+ or dMMR/MSI-H with TMB-H was associated with high T cell-inflamed scores in both HR+/HER2- and TNBC. Among several associated biomarkers, Conclusion: High TMB alone does not strongly correlate with immune infiltrate or immune-related gene signatures in MBC. TMB-H predicts T-cell inflamed signature compared to TMB-L in HR+/HER2- tumors only. Along with MSI-H and PD-L1+, several biomarkers, including

Indexed as

breast cancergenetic profilingimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmicroenvironmenttumor mutational burden

Identifiers

PMID37637072
PMCPMC10457522
OpenAlexW4385754563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.