Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636918›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Processability of Thermoelectric Ultrafine Fibers via Electrospinning for Wearable Electronics.

Elena Ewaldz, Joshua M Rinehart, Madison Miller, Blair Brettmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elena EwaldzSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 711 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Joshua M RinehartSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 711 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-2749
Madison MillerSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 711 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9317-8155
Blair BrettmannSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 711 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1335-2120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymer-based thermoelectric generators hold great appeal in the realm of wearable electronics as they enable the utilization of body heat for power generation. Fibers produced from conducting polymers for use in thermoelectric generators have high porosity and good flexibility, providing comfort-based performance advantages over thin films for wearable electronics. Some fiber processing techniques have been explored to produce textile-based thermoelectric generators; however, they fail to approach the conductivities of polymeric thin films. Ultrafine fibers solution processed through electrospinning yield fiber diameters on the nanoscale, allowing for high surface area to volume ratios and thus low thermal conductivity; however, a number of processing challenges in electrospinning conducting polymers limit the success of preparing high performing thermoelectric textiles. In this work, the specific processing challenges inherent to electrospinning conducting polymers are addressed for both n- and p-type materials. For the p-type polymer, 63 wt % PEDOT:PSS fibers are fabricated through solution formulation improvements yielding a conductivity of 3 S/cm and a power factor of 0.1 μW/mK

Identifiers

PMID37636918
PMCPMC10448483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.