Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636824›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Deep brain stimulation for substance use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nour Shaheen, Ahmed Shaheen, Can Sarica, Arun Singh, Mario Zanaty, Karim Johari, Andrew Yang, Theresa Zesiewicz, Brian Dalm, Yarema Bezchlibnyk and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Deep brain stimulation for psychostimulant use disorders.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Nour ShaheenAlexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ahmed ShaheenAlexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
Can SaricaDivision of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arun SinghDivision of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, United States.
Mario ZanatyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Karim JohariDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.
Andrew YangDivision of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Theresa ZesiewiczDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Brian DalmDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Yarema BezchlibnykDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Andres M LozanoDivision of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Oliver FloutyDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
University of South Florida · USUniversity of Toronto · CAAlexandria University · EGNeurological Surgery · USLouisiana State University · USUniversity of South Dakota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Substance use disorder (SUD) is a significant public health issue with a high mortality rate. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown promising results in treating SUD in certain cases. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of DBS in the treatment of SUD and reduction of relapse rates. Methods: We performed a thorough and methodical search of the existing scientific literature, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, to identify 16 original studies that fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We used the evidence levels recommended by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine to assess bias. The R version 4.2.3 software was utilized to calculate the mean effect size. We estimated study heterogeneity by employing tau2 and I2 indices and conducting Cochran's Q test. Results: The results showed that DBS treatment resulted in a significant improvement in the clinical SUD scales of patients, with an average improvement of 59.6%. The observed relapse rate was 8%. The meta-analysis estimated a mean effect size of 55.9 [40.4; 71.4]. Heterogeneity analysis showed a large degree of heterogeneity among the included studies. Subgroup and meta-regression analysis based on age and SUD type suggested that DBS may be more effective for patients above 45 years of age, and for alcohol and opioid addiction compared to nicotine addiction. Conclusion: The current literature suggests that DBS has a moderate effect on SUD symptoms. However, the limited number of studies and small sample size indicate that more research is needed to better understand the factors that influence its effectiveness.

Indexed as

addictionalcoholdeep brain stimulationheroinsubstance abusetobacco

Identifiers

PMID37636824
PMCPMC10449586
OpenAlexW4385728419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.