Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636772›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2023

QoL Following Dacryocystorhinostomy: Linguistic Adaptation of Italian Version of GBI.

Elena Cantone, Aldo Torrisi, Aurelio D'Ecclesia, Eva Aurora Massimilla, Giovanni Motta, Gaetano Motta

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elena CantoneDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences-ENT Section, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7389-2033
Aldo TorrisiDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences-ENT Section, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Aurelio D'EcclesiaENT Operative Unit, IRCCS "Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Eva Aurora MassimillaHead and Neck Surgery Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Giovanni MottaHead and Neck Surgery Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Gaetano MottaHead and Neck Surgery Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) is a generic patient recorded outcome measure assessing the quality of life of patients undergoing ear nose and troth surgery. Although largely used in the clinical practice, it has never been adapted and validated in the Italian language. The aim of the study was to translate the original GBI from English to Italian and to examine its reliability for use in the Italian adult population of patients undergoing endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. After translation and back-translation of the original English we evaluated the reliability of GBI for use in 79 Italian adults undergoing dacryocystorhinostomies. Reliability of GBI-IT was examined by the internal consistency of the scale (using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient), and by the test-retest analysis. The GBI-IT showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85 for the total scale). The total GBI-IT score showed a strong correlation in retests (CCC 0.87). In conclusion, our study showed that the GBI-IT has satisfactory internal consistency and reliability and is equivalent to the original English version. In addition, it can be considered a valuable measure for both clinical and research uses.

Indexed as

DacryocystitisDacryocystorhinostomiesDCRGBIQoL

Identifiers

PMID37636772
PMCPMC10447665
OpenAlexW4360613583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.