Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636751›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2023

Newborn Hearing Screening with Two-Step Protocol and Risk Factor Identification: Our Experience at a Tertiary Care Centre in Eastern India.

Pradipta Kumar Parida, Aswathi Kallyadan Veetil, Vinusree Karakkandy, Preetam Chappity, Saurav Sarkar, Pradeep Pradhan, Dillip Kumar Samal, Abhishek Anil, Anju Sara Eby

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pradipta Kumar ParidaDepartment of ENT and HNS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Aswathi Kallyadan VeetilDepartment of ENT and HNS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Vinusree KarakkandyDepartment of ENT and HNS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Preetam ChappityDepartment of ENT and HNS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Saurav SarkarDepartment of ENT and HNS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Pradeep PradhanDepartment of ENT and HNS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Dillip Kumar SamalDepartment of ENT and HNS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Abhishek AnilDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Anju Sara EbyAll India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · INDr. S.R. Chandrasekhar Institute of Speech and Hearing · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of hearing loss and identify the high-risk factors among neonates with hearing loss. Methods: Retrospective study done on 1054 infants in a tertiary care centre in Eastern India from 2020 to 2021 and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. A two-step protocol is used for screening. In the well-nursed group, OAE and BOA were performed. In the case of REFER results for automated ABR following OAE evaluation in well-nursed babies, a detailed audiological evaluation was scheduled to be carried out using diagnostic ABR within one month of age. In the high-risk group, hearing screening includes OAE, BOA, and AABR evaluations. AABR evaluation was performed as a part of the screening protocol irrespective of the results of OAE screening as PASS or REFER. Results: In our study among 1053 neonates screened, 375 were in the risk category, and 679 were without risk factors. The overall prevalence of hearing loss in neonates was 22.78 per 1000 screened neonates and 56 per 1000 among high-risk neonates. In the high-risk group, we were able to identify 4 cases of Auditory spectrum neuropathy disorder with the use of AABR during 1st step of screening. In multivariate regression analysis, the risk factors for hearing loss identified were NICU stay (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.1-12.03) and Craniofacial anomalies (OR = 55.37, 95% CI = 16.48- 186.01). Conclusion: Early neonatal screening helps in the detection, intervention, and rehabilitation of hearing loss. The use of AABR in risk infant screening enhanced the chance of detection of auditory spectrum neuropathy disorder (ASND) cases. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03723-3.

Indexed as

AudiologyHearing lossNeonatal screeningRisk factorsUniversal hearing screening

Identifiers

PMID37636751
PMCPMC10447311
OpenAlexW4361285976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.