Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636577›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Efficacy of salvage therapies for advanced acral melanoma after anti-PD-1 monotherapy failure: a multicenter retrospective study of 108 Japanese patients.

Tatsuhiko Mori, Kenjiro Namikawa, Naoya Yamazaki, Yukiko Kiniwa, Osamu Yamasaki, Shusuke Yoshikawa, Takashi Inozume, Hiroshi Kato, Yasuo Nakai, Satoshi Fukushima and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Tatsuhiko MoriDepartment of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Kenjiro NamikawaDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoya YamazakiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukiko KiniwaDepartment of Dermatology, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan.
Osamu YamasakiDepartment of Dermatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Shusuke YoshikawaDivision of Dermatology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Takashi InozumeDepartment of Dermatology, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroshi KatoDepartment of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasuo NakaiDepartment of Dermatology, Mie University, Mie, Japan.
Satoshi FukushimaDepartment of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tatsuya TakenouchiDepartment of Dermatology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Takeo MaekawaDepartment of Dermatology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Shigeto MatsushitaDepartment of Dermato-Oncology/Dermatology, National Hospital Organization Kagoshima Medical Center, Kagoshima, Japan.
Atsushi OtsukaDepartment of Dermatology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Motoo NomuraDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Natsuki BabaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Taiki IseiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Shintaro SaitoDepartment of Dermatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Noriki FujimotoDepartment of Dermatology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Ryo TanakaDepartment of Dermatology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
Takahide KanekoDepartment of Dermatology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yutaka KuwatsukaDepartment of Dermatology, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Taisuke MatsuyaDepartment of Dermatology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Kotaro NagaseDivision of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Masazumi OnishiDepartment of Dermatology, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.
Takehiro OnumaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Yasuhiro NakamuraDepartment of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Saitama Medical University · JPAsahikawa Medical University · JPChiba University · JPGunma University · JPIwate Medical University · JPJichi Medical University · JPJuntendo University Urayasu Hospital · JPKawasaki Medical School · JPKindai University Hospital · JPKumamoto University · JPKyoto University · JPMie University · JPNagasaki University · JPNagoya City University · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPOkayama University · JPOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPŌtani University · JPSaga University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy is one of the standard systemic therapies for advanced melanoma; however, the efficacy of salvage systemic therapies after PD-1 monotherapy failure (PD-1 MF), particularly in acral melanoma (AM), the main clinical melanoma type in Japanese patients, is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of salvage systemic therapies in Japanese patients with AM after PD-1 MF. Patients and methods: The study included 108 patients with advanced AM (palm and sole, 72; nail apparatus, 36) who underwent salvage systemic therapy at 24 Japanese institutions. We mainly assessed the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-six (33%) patients received ipilimumab, 23 (21%) received nivolumab and ipilimumab (nivo/ipi), 10 (9%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 4 (4%) received BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi), and the remaining 35 (32%) continued with PD-1 monotherapy after disease progression. The ORRs in the ipilimumab, nivo/ipi, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and BRAFi/MEKi groups were 8, 17, 0, and 100%, respectively. The nivo/ipi group showed the longest OS (median, 18.9 months); however, differences in ORR, PFS, and OS between the groups were insignificant. The OS in the nivo/ipi group was higher in the palm and sole groups than in the nail apparatus group (median: not reached vs. 8.7 months, Conclusion: Nivo/ipi was not more effective than cytotoxic chemotherapy and ipilimumab after PD-1 MF in patients with advanced AM. The prognosis after PD-1 MF would be poorer for nail apparatus melanoma than for palm and sole melanoma.

Indexed as

immunotherapymelanomanailsprogrammed cell death 1 receptorsalvage therapy

Identifiers

PMID37636577
PMCPMC10448186
OpenAlexW4385720913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.