Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636551›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2021

Conversion to Resectability Using Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Binkui Li, Jiliang Qiu, Yun Zheng, Yunxing Shi, Ruhai Zou, Wei He, Yichuang Yuan, Yuanping Zhang, Chenwei Wang, Zhiyu Qiu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Binkui LiFrom the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Liver Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Jiliang QiuFrom the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Liver Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yun ZhengFrom the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Liver Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yunxing ShiFrom the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Liver Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Ruhai ZouDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Wei HeFrom the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Liver Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yichuang YuanFrom the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Liver Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanping ZhangFrom the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Liver Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Chenwei WangFrom the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Liver Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiyu QiuFrom the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Liver Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Kai LiFrom the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Liver Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Chengrui ZhongFrom the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Liver Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yunfei YuanFrom the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Liver Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether this conversion rate to resectability could be increased when patients are treated with transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (TACE-HAIC) using oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin. Background: Conventional TACE (c-TACE) is a common regimen for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which converts to curative-intent resection in about 10% of those patients. It is urgent need to investigated better regimen for those patients. Methods: The data of 83 initially unresectable HCC patients were examined, including 41 patients in the TACE-HAIC group and 42 patients in the c-TACE group. Their response rate, conversion rate to resection, survival outcome, and adverse events were compared. Results: The conversion rate was significantly better in the TACE-HAIC group than in the c-TACE group (48.8% vs 9.5%; Conclusions: TACE-HAIC demonstrated a higher conversion rate and progression-free survival benefit than c-TACE and could be considered as a more effective regimen for patients with initially unresectable HCC. Future prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm it.

Indexed as

conversion therapyhepatic artery chemotherapy infusionhepatocellular carcinomatransarterial chemoembolizationunresectable

Identifiers

PMID37636551
PMCPMC10455427
OpenAlexW3156288964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.