Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636523›Full record

ArticleAdvanced research in gastroenterology & hepatology2021

Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Post-Treatment Surveillance Patterns of Care: A SEER- Medicare Study.

Catherine Chioreso, Mary C Schroeder, Irena Gribovskaja Rupp, Eric Ammann, Knute D Carter, Charles F Lynch, Elizabeth A Chrischilles, Mary E Charlton

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced research in gastroenterology & hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 69% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine ChioresoDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, USA.
Mary C SchroederDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, USA.
Irena Gribovskaja RuppDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, USA.
Eric AmmannDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, USA.
Knute D CarterDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, USA.
Charles F LynchDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, USA.
Elizabeth A ChrischillesDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, USA.
Mary E CharltonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, USA.
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy · US

Funding

Adding patient and provider viewpoints to rectal cancer practice variation dataK07CA197067 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CHARLTON, MARY E. · 2015 to 2019
$709k
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201300020CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201300020INCI NIH HHS K07 CA197067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite high rectal cancer recurrence rates, knowledge on post-treatment surveillance utilization is limited. Hence, this study aims to estimate patterns of post-treatment surveillance and determine associated factors. Patients and Methods: Retrospective study of 1,024 SEER-Medicare patients >65 years old diagnosed with stage II/III rectal cancer between 2007-2013. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with ≥1 colonoscopy, ≥2 physician visits, ≥2 carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) tests and ≥2 computed tomographic colonography (CT) within 14 months after primary treatment. Results: Fifty-five percent had ≥1 colonoscopy, 54% had ≥2 physician visits, 47% had ≥2 CEA tests and 20% had ≥2 CTs. In multivariable logistic models, younger age and receipt of chemoradiation therapy (vs none) were significant across all surveillance procedures while clinical factors such as comorbidity were not. Being married (OR=1.69; 95% CI: 1.26-2.26) and proximity to a high-volume hospital (≤15 vs >30 minutes, OR=1.56; 95% CI: 1.00-2.43) were associated with ≥1 colonoscopy. Female gender (OR=1.56; 95% CI: 1.17-2.09), being married (OR=1.56; 95% CI: 1.17-2.08), white race (OR=1.79; 95% CI: 1.23- 2.62) and surgery from high-volume surgeon (OR=1.47; 95% CI: 1.06-2.04) were associated with ≥2 physician visits. Female gender (OR=1.45; 95% CI: 1.08-1.95), being married (OR=1.46; 95% CI: 1.08-1.96) and surgery from high-volume surgeon (OR=1.55; 95% CI: 1.10-2.17) had higher ≥2 CEA tests. Conclusions: Post-treatment surveillance remains low but is more common among younger patients and recipients of chemoradiation. Distinct profiles of patient characteristics and provider volume were associated with individual surveillance procedures suggesting the need for multicomponent strategies to increase surveillance.

Indexed as

Follow-upPost-treatment patterns of careRectal cancerSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID37636523
PMCPMC10457021
OpenAlexW4362713481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.