ArticleRSC advances2023
Yttrium- and zirconium-decorated Mg
Article in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering rhodium encapsulated indium doped fullerene for NHScientific reports · 2025Article
- Retraction: Computational design and molecular modeling of the interaction of nicotinic acid hydrazide nickel-based complexes with HRSC advances · 2025Article
- Investigation of substituent effects on the electronic structure and antiviral activity of favipiravir derivatives for Covid-19 treatment using DFT and molecular docking.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Adsorption and sensor performance of transition metal-decorated zirconium-doped silicon carbide nanotubes for NORSC advances · 2024Article
- Single-atoms (N, P, S) encapsulation of Ni-doped graphene/PEDOT hybrid materials as sensors for HScientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-04-03Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Image · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Duplication of/in Image · Euphemisms for Duplication · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Unreliable Data ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diazomethane (CH
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.