Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636484›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2023

Improving Safety in Living Liver Donation: Lessons From Intraoperative Adverse Events in 438 Donors Undergoing a Left Liver Resection.

Eliano Bonaccorsi-Riani, Victoria Daudré-Vignier, Olga Ciccarelli, Laurent Coubeau, Samuele Iesari, Diego Castanares-Zapatero, Christine Collienne, Laurence Annet, Etienne Danse, Jean-Luc Balligand and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Transition From Open to Full Robotic Living Donor Left Liver Graft Procurement for Pediatric Recipients- Experience From a Western Center.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eliano Bonaccorsi-RianiTransplantation and Abdominal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5022-0234
Victoria Daudré-VignierTransplantation and Abdominal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9880-0089
Olga CiccarelliTransplantation and Abdominal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-1660
Laurent CoubeauTransplantation and Abdominal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3968-5591
Samuele IesariKidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6918-945X
Diego Castanares-ZapateroAdult Intensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7112-2070
Christine CollienneAdult Intensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2538-259X
Laurence AnnetDepartment of Radiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6879-7341
Etienne DanseDepartment of Radiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0951-9856
Jean-Luc BalligandInstitute de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique - IREC, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0522-4156
Chantal LefebvreInstitute de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique - IREC, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2730-3856
Audrey DieuDepartment of Anesthesia, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6026-1734
Loïc BenoitDepartment of Anesthesia, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-9176
Raymond RedingTransplantation and Abdominal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-4600
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Donor safety is paramount in living organ donation. Left liver resections are considered safer than right lobe hepatectomies. However, unexpected intraoperative adverse events (iAEs), defined as any deviation from the ideal intraoperative course, can also occur during left liver resections and may be life threatening or lead to postoperative complication or permanent harm to the donor and recipient. Methods: Records of 438 liver living donors (LDs) who underwent 393 left lateral sectionectomies (LLSs) and 45 left hepatectomies (LHs) between July 1993 and December 2018 in a pediatric living-donor liver transplantation center were reviewed for the appearance of iAEs that could have influenced the donor morbidity and mortality and that could have contributed to the improvement of the LD surgical protocol. Results: Clinical characteristics of LLS and LH groups were comparable. Nine iAEs were identified, an incidence of 2%, all of them occurring in the LLS group. Seven of them were related to a surgical maneuver (5 associated with vascular management and 2 with the biliary tree approach). One iAE was associated with an incomplete donor workup and the last with drug administration. Each iAE resulted in subsequent changes in the surgical protocol. Donor outcome was at risk by 5 iAEs classed as type a, recipient outcome by 2 iAEs (type b) and both by 2 iAEs (type c). Postoperative complications occurred in 87 LDs (19.9%), with no differences between the LLS and LH groups ( Conclusions: iAEs debriefings induced changes in our LD protocol and may have contributed to reduced morbidity and zero mortality. iAEs analysis can be used as a quality and safety improvement tool in the context of LD procedures, which may include right liver donation, laparoscopic, and robotic living liver graft procurement.

Identifiers

PMID37636484
PMCPMC10455133
OpenAlexW4386208833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.