ReviewHeliyon2023
Potential ecological risk assessment of heavy metals associated with abattoir liquid waste: A narrative and systematic review.
Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The article presents a narrative and systematic review of the potential ecological risk assessment of heavy metals associated with abattoir liquid waste for knowledge advancement. The narrative review primarily focused on (i) An overview of abattoir operations; (ii) Characteristics of abattoir liquid waste; (iii) Heavy metals in the liquid waste and their health effects; (iv) Environmental impacts of abattoir liquid waste; and (v) Potential ecological risk index (RI) methodology. These provided essential literature for the systematic review. Using exclusive/inclusive criteria, 15 abattoirs that satisfied the eligibility criteria, all located in Nigeria, were used for the systematic review with meta-analysis/meta-regression. Comparative multiple linear meta-regression analyses were used to quantify the heterogeneity variances between the abattoirs based on standardized RIs (SRIs; effect sizes) using eight tau (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.