Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636449›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Leveraging deep learning to identify calcification and colloid in thyroid nodules.

Chen Chen, Yuanzhen Liu, Jincao Yao, Lujiao Lv, Qianmeng Pan, Jinxin Wu, Changfu Zheng, Hui Wang, Xianping Jiang, Yifan Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A "calcification"-enhanced deep learning approach for precise differentiation of thyroid nodules.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chen ChenGraduate School, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241002, China.
Yuanzhen LiuDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
Jincao YaoDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
Lujiao LvKey Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
Qianmeng PanTaizhou Cancer Hospital, Taizhou, 317502, China.
Jinxin WuTaizhou Cancer Hospital, Taizhou, 317502, China.
Changfu ZhengTaizhou Cancer Hospital, Taizhou, 317502, China.
Hui WangTaizhou Cancer Hospital, Taizhou, 317502, China.
Xianping JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shengzhou People's Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Shengzhou Branch), Shengzhou, 312400, China.
Yifan WangDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
Dong XuDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNWenzhou Medical University · CNSheng Jing Hospital · CNWannan Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Both calcification and colloid in thyroid nodules are reflected as echogenic foci in ultrasound images. However, calcification and colloid have significantly different probabilities of malignancy. We explored the performance of a deep learning (DL) model in distinguishing the echogenic foci of thyroid nodules as calcification or colloid. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using ultrasound image sets. The DL model was trained and tested on 30,388 images of 1127 nodules. All nodules were pathologically confirmed. The area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) was employed as the primary evaluation index. Results: The YoloV5 (You Only Look Once Version 5) transfer learning model for thyroid nodules based on DL detection showed that the average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of distinguishing echogenic foci in the test 1 group (n = 192) was 78.41%, 91.36%, and 77.81%, respectively. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the three radiologists were 51.14%, 82.58%, and 61.29%, respectively. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of distinguishing small echogenic foci in the test 2 group (n = 58) was 70.17%, 77.14%, and 73.33%, respectively. Correspondingly, the average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the radiologists were 57.69%, 63.29%, and 59.38%. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that DL performed far better than radiologists in distinguishing echogenic foci of thyroid nodules as calcifications or colloid.

Indexed as

CalcificationColloidDeep learningThyroid noduleUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37636449
PMCPMC10450979
OpenAlexW4385752768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.