ArticleHeliyon2023
Does acupuncture have advantages in the rehabilitation of vascular mild cognitive impairment? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electroacupuncture Targeting the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Senescence‑associated Cognitive Impairment: Mechanistic Synthesis and Meta‑analysis of Clinical Randomized Controlled Trials.Neurochemical research · 2026Pooled it
- Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment and non-pharmacological interventions targeting the nervous system: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of skull base-peripheral acupuncture for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Neural mechanisms of acupuncture in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a protocol for an fMRI-based systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Cognitive screening test for rehabilitation using spatiotemporal data extracted from a digital trail making test part-A.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vascular mild cognitive impairment (VMCI) is a common impairment caused by vascular factors. VMCI often occurs after stroke, and it is the main clinical manifestation of long-term disability. Many patients are treated with acupuncture in combination with other therapies. However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of this treatment regimen is lacking. Aims: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture therapy for treating VMCI. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting and meta-analysis guidelines. The CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, Cochrane Library, PubMed and Embase databases were searched from inception to August 20, 2022. After two researchers independently screened the literature, they extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. Revman 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. Summary of review: Thirty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The overall effective rate of acupuncture for treating VMCI was 3.06, 95% CI [2.39, 3.91], (P < 0.05). Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Barthel Index and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) scores significantly differed between the treatment and control groups, with weighted mean differences (WMDs) [95% CI] (P value) of 1.97 [1.44, 2.49] (P < 0.05), 2.02 [1.50, 2.54] (P < 0.05), 5.54 [3.81, 7.28] (P < 0.05), and 3.43 [2.53, 4.33] (P < 0.05), respectively. The overall effective rate of electroacupuncture (EA) for treating VMCI was better than that of the control group (RR = 2.25, 95% CI, [1.13, 4.50], P < 0.05). MoCA, MMSE, Barthel index and ADL scores differed significantly between the treatment and control groups, with WMDs [95% CI] (P value) of 1.79 [1.20, 2.38] (P < 0.05), 1.45 [0.87, 2.03] (P < 0.05), 5.78 [2.38, 9.18] (P < 0.05), and 3.15 [2.15, 4.15] (P < 0.05), respectively. Acupuncture alone and combined with drug therapy were thus superior to drug therapy alone for improving cognitive function. EA also has potential advantages. Conclusions: Acupuncture combined with another therapy is better than other therapies alone, such as simple drug therapy, for treating VMCI. However, variations in study duration (4-12 weeks) limit us from drawing any definitive conclusions about long-term effects. Therefore, more RCTs with rigorous designs and reasonable treatment and follow-up durations are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.