Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636283›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

Artificial tears: Promising treatment or silent threat to public health?

Sanila Mughal, Syeda K Sakina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Efficacy of Cefiderocol Against Endophthalmitis Isolates.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanila MughalDepartment of Medicine Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9794-9380
Syeda K SakinaDepartment of Medicine Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0008-1320-8165
Dow University of Health Sciences · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Dry Eye Disease (DED) is a multifactorial chronic inflammatory condition of the corneal surface, attributed to insufficient or low-quality production of tears, accounting for 5-50% of the cases globally. Artificial tears are the first line of treatment as they reduce ocular surface tension, and improve film stability and optical quality. EzriCare Artificial Tears are preservative-free, multi-dose, readily accessible eye drops containing carboxymethylcellulose sodium solution (10 mg in 1 ml) aiming for relief against DED. This article discusses the public health challenges faced by the use of EzriCare Artificial Tears and emphasizes the need for alternative therapies for the effective management of DED. Methods: We searched for articles documenting the incidence of the current multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa strain outbreak caused by the use of preservative-free artificial tears and the challenges faced through the use of artificial tears on PubMed, and Google Scholar. Results: EzriCare and other preservative-free artificial tears have been reported to pose a serious public health risk as they have been found to be the commonly used product among the people infected with the current multi-state outbreak of the multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa strain. Conclusion: The current multi-state outbreak of the multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa strain has raised concerns about the safe use of other artificial products. It is high time that further trials should be conducted on other alternative strategies and evaluate the safety and efficacy of nanotechnology in the treatment of dry eye disease.

Indexed as

artificial tearsdrug‐resistant outbreakdry eye diseaseEzriCarepreservative‐free

Identifiers

PMID37636283
PMCPMC10448608
OpenAlexW4386143007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.