Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636264›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2023

Unraveling patient heterogeneity in complex diseases through individualized co-expression networks: a perspective.

Verónica Latapiat, Mauricio Saez, Inti Pedroso, Alberto J M Martin

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Verónica LatapiatPrograma de Doctorado en Genómica Integrativa, Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.
Mauricio SaezCentro de Oncología de Precisión, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.
Inti PedrosoVicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.
Alberto J M MartinFundación Ciencia & Vida, Escuela de Ingeniería, Facultad de Ingeniería, Arquitecturay Diseño, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile to Fundación Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile.
Universidad Mayor · CLFundación Ciencia and Vida · CLSan Sebastián University · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This perspective highlights the potential of individualized networks as a novel strategy for studying complex diseases through patient stratification, enabling advancements in precision medicine. We emphasize the impact of interpatient heterogeneity resulting from genetic and environmental factors and discuss how individualized networks improve our ability to develop treatments and enhance diagnostics. Integrating system biology, combining multimodal information such as genomic and clinical data has reached a tipping point, allowing the inference of biological networks at a single-individual resolution. This approach generates a specific biological network per sample, representing the individual from which the sample originated. The availability of individualized networks enables applications in personalized medicine, such as identifying malfunctions and selecting tailored treatments. In essence, reliable, individualized networks can expedite research progress in understanding drug response variability by modeling heterogeneity among individuals and enabling the personalized selection of pharmacological targets for treatment. Therefore, developing diverse and cost-effective approaches for generating these networks is crucial for widespread application in clinical services.

Indexed as

co-expressiondiseasesnetworksomicspersonalized medicinetranscriptomic

Identifiers

PMID37636264
PMCPMC10449456
OpenAlexW4385725607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.