Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636216›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in infectious disease

A review of evidence, antimicrobial stability, and feasibility considerations for OPAT continuous infusion.

Amy L Van Abel, Lindsey M Childs-Kean, Kelsey L Jensen, Ryan P Mynatt, Keenan L Ryan, Christina G Rivera

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Carbapenem-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Resistance mechanisms and therapeutic strategies forTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Amy L Van AbelDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1965-0674
Lindsey M Childs-KeanCollege of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Kelsey L JensenMayo Clinic Health System - Southeast Minnesota Region, Austin, MN, USA.
Ryan P MynattInfectious Diseases, UK HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA.
Keenan L RyanDepartment of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-0711
Christina G RiveraDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic Health System · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Kentucky HealthCare · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has been widely used in clinical practice for many decades because of its associated cost savings, reductions in inpatient hospital days, and decreases in hospital-associated infections. Despite this long history, evolving practice patterns and new drug delivery devices continue to present challenges as well as opportunities for clinicians when designing appropriate outpatient antimicrobial regimens. One such change is the increasing use of extended and continuous infusion (CI) of antimicrobials to optimize the achievement of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets. Elastomeric devices are also becoming increasingly popular in OPAT, including for the delivery of CI. In this article, we review the clinical evidence for CI in OPAT, as well as practical considerations of patient preferences, cost, and antimicrobial stability.

Indexed as

anti-infective agentscontinuous infusionelastomericOPAToutpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapyoutpatientspatient satisfactionstability

Identifiers

PMID37636216
PMCPMC10451047
OpenAlexW4386106434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.