Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636187›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2023

A single group trial (before - after) on impact of physiotherapeutic intervention package on relief from low back pain of pregnant women.

Pradip Kumar Sarkar, Ajit Kumar, Amarjeet Singh, Sonika Sharma, Sudip Bhattacharya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pradip Kumar SarkarDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ajit KumarDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Amarjeet SinghDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sonika SharmaDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sudip BhattacharyaDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: More than half of the women have low back pain (LBP) at some point during pregnancy; the intensity of back pain increases as the pregnancy progresses. Such changes increase their risk for musculoskeletal disorders and fall injuries. Aim and Objective: Our study's objective was to estimate the prevalence of LBP in antenatal and postnatal cases of pregnancy in PGIMER, Chandigarh and to ascertain impact of a training intervention on incidence and severity of LBP in the study subjects. Methodology: A single group trial (before and after) on impact of physiotherapeutic intervention package on relief from LBP in pregnant women in between 20 and 35 years of age group were selected. The study duration was one year. The numeric pain rating scale was taken for measuring pain intensity at different levels. Where 0 indicates no pain, 1-3 indicates mild pain (which may be nagging, annoying, and interfering little with activities of daily livings (ADLs)), 4-6 indicates moderate pain (interferes significant with ADLs), and 7-10 indicates severe pain (Disabling, unable to perform ADLs). As per available time, it was decided to include at least 30 subjects in the study. Results: Initially 45 patients were enrolled. Of those, 30 patients were suffering from backache, that is, 67% of the total and 33% did not have any backache. There were no backaches reported in the first trimester, five cases were in the second trimester, and 18 cases were in the third trimester. Of 30 patients, 11 were less than 25 years of age and remaining 19 patients were in the age group of 26-35 years.

Indexed as

Disabilitylow back painpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37636187
PMCPMC10451580
OpenAlexW4383111265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.