ArticleSpine surgery and related research2023
Correlation between Respiratory Dysfunction and Dysphagia in Individuals with Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation of dysphagia in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Accuracy of Balloons and Handheld Spirometers as Low-Cost Tools for Measuring Vital Capacity and Air Volume: A Laboratory-Based Validation Study.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2026Article
- Prognostic significance of nutritional status for neurological and functional recovery after cervical spinal cord injury.PloS one · 2026Article
- Effect of nutritional status on occurrence of pneumonia after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of clinical factors predicting dysphagia in patients with traumatic and non-traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a retrospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aspiration pneumonia is one of the most frequent and fatal life-threatening complications among individuals with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI). However, the mechanism of dysphagia among individuals with CSCI is not well understood. Morbidity and mortality associated with CSCI may result from the interplay between respiratory dysfunction and dysphagia. This study aimed to elucidate the effect of respiratory dysfunction on the swallowing function of individuals with acute traumatic CSCI. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 54 individuals with acute traumatic CSCI who were admitted within 2 weeks following injury. Dysphagia was evaluated using the Dysphagia Severity Scale (DSS) and the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). Respiratory function was evaluated by measuring the cough peak flow (CPF), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV Results: Among 54 individuals (46 men and 8 women) recruited in this study, 48 (88.9%) had restrictive ventilatory impairment and 17 (31.5%) had severe dysphagia (DSS level 1-4) 2 weeks following injury. However, respiratory function and swallowing function significantly improved thereafter. CPF, FEV Conclusions: Restrictive ventilatory impairment, poor cough force, and dysphagia are closely related, and the evaluation of respiratory function plays an important role in evaluating dysphagia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.