Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636098›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023

Microplastic stress in plants: effects on plant growth and their remediations.

Li Jia, Lining Liu, Yujing Zhang, Wenxuan Fu, Xing Liu, Qianqian Wang, Mohsin Tanveer, Liping Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Li JiaCollege of Food and Drug, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Lining LiuInternational Research Center for Environmental Membrane Biology, College of Food Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Yujing ZhangInternational Research Center for Environmental Membrane Biology, College of Food Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Wenxuan FuInternational Research Center for Environmental Membrane Biology, College of Food Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Xing LiuInternational Research Center for Environmental Membrane Biology, College of Food Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Qianqian WangInternational Research Center for Environmental Membrane Biology, College of Food Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Mohsin TanveerTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Liping HuangInternational Research Center for Environmental Membrane Biology, College of Food Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Foshan University · CNLuoyang Normal University · CNUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastic (MP) pollution is becoming a global problem due to the resilience, long-term persistence, and robustness of MPs in different ecosystems. In terrestrial ecosystems, plants are exposed to MP stress, thereby affecting overall plant growth and development. This review article has critically analyzed the effects of MP stress in plants. We found that MP stress-induced reduction in plant physical growth is accompanied by two complementary effects: (i) blockage of pores in seed coat or roots to alter water and nutrient uptake, and (ii) induction of drought due to increased soil cracking effects of MPs. Nonetheless, the reduction in physiological growth under MP stress is accompanied by four complementary effects: (i) excessive production of ROS, (ii) alteration in leaf and root ionome, (iii) impaired hormonal regulation, and (iv) decline in chlorophyll and photosynthesis. Considering that, we suggested that targeting the redox regulatory mechanisms could be beneficial in improving tolerance to MPs in plants; however, antioxidant activities are highly dependent on plant species, plant tissue, MP type, and MP dose. MP stress also indirectly reduces plant growth by altering soil productivity. However, MP-induced negative effects vary due to the presence of different surface functional groups and particle sizes. In the end, we suggested the utilization of agronomic approaches, including the application of growth regulators, biochar, and replacing plastic mulch with crop residues, crop diversification, and biological degradation, to ameliorate the effects of MP stress in plants. The efficiency of these methods is also MP-type-specific and dose-dependent.

Indexed as

gene expressionionic homeostasismicroplasticsphotosynthesisphytohormonal regulationroot and shoot physiologyROS

Identifiers

PMID37636098
PMCPMC10452891
OpenAlexW4385754905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.