Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636074›Full record

ReviewiScience2023

Emerging advances in biosecurity to underpin human, animal, plant, and ecosystem health.

Philip E Hulme, Jacqueline R Beggs, Rachelle N Binny, Jonathan P Bray, Naomi Cogger, Manpreet K Dhami, Susanna C Finlay-Smits, Nigel P French, Andrea Grant, Chad L Hewitt and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Integrating landscape ecology into generic surveillance plans for bark- and wood-boring beetles.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Trouble on the horizon: anticipating biological invasions through futures thinking.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Philip E HulmeThe Centre for One Biosecurity Research, Analysis and Synthesis, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln, Christchurch 7648, New Zealand.
Jacqueline R BeggsCentre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Rachelle N BinnyManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Jonathan P BrayThe Centre for One Biosecurity Research, Analysis and Synthesis, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln, Christchurch 7648, New Zealand.
Naomi CoggerTāwharau Ora, School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North 4472, New Zealand.
Manpreet K DhamiManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Susanna C Finlay-SmitsManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Nigel P FrenchTāwharau Ora, School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North 4472, New Zealand.
Andrea GrantScion, 10 Kyle Street, Riccarton, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
Chad L HewittThe Centre for One Biosecurity Research, Analysis and Synthesis, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln, Christchurch 7648, New Zealand.
Eirian E JonesThe Centre for One Biosecurity Research, Analysis and Synthesis, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln, Christchurch 7648, New Zealand.
Phil J LesterSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand.
Peter J LockhartSchool of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4472, New Zealand.
Lincoln University · NZManaaki Whenua – Landcare Research · NZMassey University · NZScion · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZVictoria University of Wellington · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One Biosecurity is an interdisciplinary approach to policy and research that builds on the interconnections between human, animal, plant, and ecosystem health to effectively prevent and mitigate the impacts of invasive alien species. To support this approach requires that key cross-sectoral research innovations be identified and prioritized. Following an interdisciplinary horizon scan for emerging research that underpins One Biosecurity, four major interlinked advances were identified: implementation of new surveillance technologies adopting state-of-the-art sensors connected to the Internet of Things, deployable handheld molecular and genomic tracing tools, the incorporation of wellbeing and diverse human values into biosecurity decision-making, and sophisticated socio-environmental models and data capture. The relevance and applicability of these innovations to address threats from pathogens, pests, and weeds in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems emphasize the opportunity to build critical mass around interdisciplinary teams at a global scale that can rapidly advance science solutions targeting biosecurity threats.

Indexed as

Biological sciencesEcologyNatural sciences

Identifiers

PMID37636074
PMCPMC10450416
OpenAlexW4385431379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.