Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636042›Full record

ArticleiScience2023

Sex-biased genome-editing effects of CRISPR-Cas9 across cancer cells dependent on p53 status.

Mengbiao Guo, Yuanyan Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mengbiao GuoKey Laboratory of Gene Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Healthy Aging Research, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Yuanyan XiongKey Laboratory of Gene Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Healthy Aging Research, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas9 system has emerged as the dominant technology for gene editing and clinical applications. One major concern is its off-target effect after the introduction of exogenous CRISPR-Cas9 into cells. Several previous studies have investigated either Cas9 alone or CRISPR-Cas9 interactions with p53. Here, we reanalyzed previously reported data of p53-associated Cas9 activities and observed large significant sex differences between p53-wildtype and p53-mutant cells. To expand the impact of this finding, we further examined all protein-coding genes for sex-specific dependencies in a large-scale CRISPR-Cas9 screening dataset from the DepMap project. We highlighted the p53-dependent sex bias of gene knockouts (including

Indexed as

CancerGeneticsMolecular genetics

Identifiers

PMID37636042
PMCPMC10448110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.