Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37635975›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Artificial oocyte activation with Ca

Jing Ling Ruan, Shan Shan Liang, Jia Ping Pan, Zhi Qin Chen, Xiao Ming Teng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Precise mimicry of physiological CaBioengineering & translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Fresh versus frozen micro-TESE sperm and outcomes.Asian journal of andrology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing Ling RuanReproductive Medicine Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shan Shan LiangReproductive Medicine Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jia Ping PanReproductive Medicine Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Zhi Qin ChenReproductive Medicine Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao Ming TengReproductive Medicine Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research question: Does artificial oocyte activation (AOA) by a calcium ionophore (ionomycin) improve the previous fertilization failure or poor embryo development of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) account for male factor infertility or other infertility causes? Design: This retrospective study involved 114 patients receiving ICSI-AOA in Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital with previous ICSI fertilization failure or poor embryo development. The previous ICSI cycles of the same patients without AOA served as the control group. The fertilization rates, cleavage rates, transferable embryo rates and blastocyst formation rates of the two groups were compared. Additionally, the clinical pregnancy, implantation rate and live birth rates were also compared to assess the efficiency and safety of AOA. Furthermore, two subgroup analyses were performed in this study based on the cause of infertility and the reason for AOA. The fertilization rate, embryonic development potential and clinical outcome were compared among groups. Results: Among 114 ICSI-AOA cycles, the fertilization rate, top-quality embryo rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy per patient and live birth rate per patient were improved significantly compared with previous ICSI cycles (p<0.05 to P< 0.001), and the miscarriage rate in the AOA group was significantly lower than that of the control group (p<0.001). In the AOA subgroups based on the cause of infertility, the fertilization rates of each subgroup were significantly improved compared with previous control cycles except for the mixed factor infertility subgroup (p<0.05 to p<0.001). In the AOA subgroups based on the reason for AOA, the fertilization rates of each subgroup were significantly increased compared with those in their previous ICSI cycle without AOA (p<0.001); however, there was no significant difference in the top-quality embryo rate. No significant improvement was found in the implantation rates and the clinical pregnancy rate in each subgroup except for the poor embryo development subgroup. In the 114 AOA cycles, 35 healthy infants (21 singletons and 7 twins) were delivered without major congenital birth defects or malformations. Conclusion: This study showed that AOA with the calcium ionophore ionomycin can improve the reproductive outcomes of patients with previous fertilization failure and poor embryo development after ICSI.

Indexed as

Infertility, MaleSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicCalcium IonophoresChinaEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleFertilizationHumansIonomycinIonophoresMalePregnancyRetrospective StudiesSemenCalcium IonophoresIonomycinIonophoresartificial oocyte activationembryo developmentfertilization failureintracytoplasmic sperm injectionionomycin

Identifiers

PMID37635975
PMCPMC10455927
OpenAlexW4385753937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.