Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37635964›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Endometrial microbiota profile in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients by culturomics-based analysis.

Federica Cariati, Consolata Carotenuto, Francesca Bagnulo, Daniela Pacella, Vincenzo Marrone, Rossella Paolillo, Maria Rosaria Catania, Raffaella Di Girolamo, Alessandro Conforti, Ida Strina and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Understanding the Associations of Urogenital Microbiomes With Fertility and In Vitro Fertilization.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Less is more! Low amount ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Federica CariatiDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Consolata CarotenutoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Francesca BagnuloDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Daniela PacellaDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo MarroneDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Rossella PaolilloDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Maria Rosaria CataniaDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Raffaella Di GirolamoDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Alessandro ConfortiDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Ida StrinaDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Carlo AlviggiDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITFederico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: It is well recognized that the human uterus and adjoining tissues of the female reproductive tract exist in a non-sterile state where dysbiosis can impact reproductive outcomes. The endometrial microbiota is a part of this greater milieu. To date, it has largely been studied using 16S rRNA or metagenomics-based methodologies. Despite the known advantages of sequencing analysis, several difficulties have been noted including sample contamination and standardization of DNA extraction or sequencing. The aim of this study was to use a culturomics-based method to analyze the endometrial microbiota and correlate the results with ongoing pregnancy rates. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed at the University of Naples from June 2022 to December 2022. Ninety-three patients undergoing an IVF cycle with single embryo transfer (ET) (fresh or frozen) were enrolled in the study. Following ET, the catheter tip was inserted into brain heart infusion (BHI) medium under sterile conditions for culture. After 24h and 48h of incubation the microorganisms in the colonies were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Results: Overall, 68 (73,92%) patients resulted positive for one or more microbes and 25 patients (26,08%) had no microbial growth. Across all participants, the four most important phyla were Discussion: Detection of bacteria by culturomics from catheter tips used for embryo transfer has been shown to be a reliable method to detect pathogen growth. Endometrial microbiota testing in clinical practice could certainly offer a means to further improve diagnosis and treatment strategies in IVF patients.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferFertilization in VitroFemaleFertilizationHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sembryo transferendometriumIVFMALDImicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID37635964
PMCPMC10450216
OpenAlexW4385580328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.