ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2024
Refining biome labeling for large-scale microbial community samples: Leveraging neural networks and transfer learning.
Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- LC-MS/MS metabolomics analysis: Leaf harvesting plus pesticide spraying can further improve the growth quality ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Techniques for learning and transferring knowledge for microbiome-based classification and prediction: review and assessment.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiome research has generated an extensive amount of data, resulting in a wealth of publicly accessible samples. Accurate annotation of these samples is crucial for effectively utilizing microbiome data across scientific disciplines. However, a notable challenge arises from the lack of essential annotations, particularly regarding collection location and sample biome information, which significantly hinders environmental microbiome research. In this study, we introduce Meta-Sorter, a novel approach utilizing neural networks and transfer learning, to enhance biome labeling for thousands of microbiome samples in the MGnify database that have incomplete information. Our findings demonstrate that Meta-Sorter achieved a remarkable accuracy rate of 96.7% in classifying samples among the 16,507 lacking detailed biome annotations. Notably, Meta-Sorter provides precise classifications for representative environmental samples that were previously ambiguously labeled as "Marine" in MGnify, thereby elucidating their specific origins in benthic and water column environments. Moreover, Meta-Sorter effectively distinguishes samples derived from human-environment interactions, enabling clear differentiation between environmental and human-related studies. By improving the completeness of biome label information for numerous microbial community samples, our research facilitates more accurate knowledge discovery across diverse disciplines, with particular implications for environmental research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.