Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37635863›Full record

ArticleComprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology2023

Reliability of diurnal salivary cortisol metrics: A meta-analysis and investigation in two independent samples.

Sara A Norton, David Aa Baranger, Ethan S Young, Michaela Voss, Isabella Hansen, Erin Bondy, Merlyn Rodrigues, Sarah E Paul, Elizabeth Edershile, Patrick L Hill and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The researcher's guide to selecting biomarkers in mental health studies.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara A NortonWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, USA.
David Aa BarangerWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, USA.
Ethan S YoungUtrecht University, Department of Psychology, the Netherlands.
Michaela VossWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, USA.
Isabella HansenWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, USA.
Erin BondyWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, USA.
Merlyn RodriguesWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, USA.
Sarah E PaulWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, USA.
Elizabeth EdershileUniversity of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, USA.
Patrick L HillWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, USA.
Thomas F OltmannsWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, USA.
Jeffry SimpsonUniversity of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, USA.
Ryan BogdanWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress-induced dysregulation of diurnal cortisol is a cornerstone of stress-disease theories; however, observed associations between cortisol, stress, and health have been inconsistent. The reliability of diurnal cortisol features may contribute to these equivocal findings. Our meta-analysis (5 diurnal features from 11 studies; total participant n = 3307) and investigation (15 diurnal cortisol features) in 2 independent studies (St. Louis Personality and Aging Network [SPAN] Study, n = 147, ages 61-73; Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Risk and Adaptation [MLSRA] Study, n = 90, age 37) revealed large variability in the day-to-day test-retest reliability of diurnal features derived from salivary cortisol data (i.e., ICC = 0.00-0.75). Collectively, these data indicate that some commonly used diurnal cortisol features have poor reliability that is insufficient for individual differences research (e.g., cortisol awakening response) while others (e.g., area under the curve with respect to ground) have fair-to-good reliability that could support reliable identification of associations in well-powered studies.

Indexed as

CortisolReliabilityStressVariability

Identifiers

PMID37635863
PMCPMC10458689
OpenAlexW4385706234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.